Calculate persistence length from force extension data of a single DNA

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the persistence length (P) of a single dsDNA molecule from force-extension data. The user plotted 1/sqrt(F) against extension (x) and fitted a linear model, using an interpolation formula from Bustamante et al. (1994) to relate force and extension. The calculated persistence length values, around 2.7 nm, are significantly lower than the expected 50 nm for dsDNA. The user seeks feedback on potential errors in their approach, particularly regarding the choice of force range and linearity assumptions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate data interpretation in biophysical measurements.
pen
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello!

From a data set of F-x measurements of a single dsDNA molecule I want to calculate the persistence length P. So I plotted \frac {1} {\sqrt{(F)}} vs. x and fitted these data points (linear).

According to an interpolation formula the extension x of a worm like chain with contour length L_0 (Bustamante et al.,1994) is:

\frac{FP}{k_BT}= \frac{1}{4} \Big( 1-\frac{x}{L_0}\Big)^{-2} -\frac{1}{4} + \frac{x}{L_0}, applicable for extensions \frac{x}{L_0}<0.97

Thus the y-intercept of the straight line fitted to the data as described above is 2\sqrt{\frac{P}{k_BT}}.

When I calculate P this way, I get values between ~2.7 nm (when I choose a force range beween ~6-17pN, which is roughly linear, and the dsDNA molecule behaves as a Hookean spring). However these values are far below the expected value for the persistence length of dsDNA (50nm).

Does anyone see what' s wrong with my approach ?


Thanks a lot for help

Pen


P.S. please find attached the F-x-graph and the 1/sqrt(F)-x-graph
 

Attachments

  • x vs (1 over F squared).jpg
    x vs (1 over F squared).jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 768
  • F-x-curve.jpg
    F-x-curve.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 667
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I find your 1/√F plot to have a y-intercept of 1.4
 
then unfortunately the plot was for a different force range, however in case the intercept is 1.4, the persistence length would be ~2nm (still much too low).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top