Calculate phase shift using transfer function

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the phase shift of a transfer function at very low frequencies. The transfer function given is H(jω) = (jωRC - ω²LC) / ((1 - ω²LC) + jωRC). At low frequencies, the denominator approaches 1, resulting in a phase angle of zero. The numerator's phase angle is determined by the expression arc tan(ωRC / -ω²LC), which simplifies to arc tan(R / -ωL) as ω approaches zero. The final phase shift can be visualized using polar coordinates to derive the correct angle.
z.gary
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given that you have found the following transfer function for a circuit, H(jω), what is the phase at very low frequencies?
(jωRC-ω2LC)/((1-ω2LC) + jωRC)
a:∏
b:-∏/2
c:+∏/2
d:0

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that the phase angle is ψ=arc tan(img(ω)/real(ω)), so i eliminated the terms in denominate with ω since the frequency is low, and i got: -ω^2LC+jωRC, then i put it into the equation: arc tan(ωRC/ω^2LC) and have no idea what to do with it. can someone tell me how to solve this arc tan equation? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi z.gary, welcome to Physics Forums.

You usually can treat the numerator and denominator separately. Find their separate angles for w << 1, then subtract the denominator angle from that of the numerator.
 
z.gary said:

Homework Statement


Given that you have found the following transfer function for a circuit, H(jω), what is the phase at very low frequencies?
(jωRC-ω2LC)/((1-ω2LC) + jωRC)
a:∏
b:-∏/2
c:+∏/2
d:0

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that the phase angle is ψ=arc tan(img(ω)/real(ω)), so i eliminated the terms in denominate with ω since the frequency is low, and i got: -ω^2LC+jωRC, then i put it into the equation: arc tan(ωRC/ω^2LC) and have no idea what to do with it. can someone tell me how to solve this arc tan equation? thanks.

Your approach is good but not 100%.

The denominator is indeed 1. So that phase angle is zero.

But the phase of the numerator is actually arc tan wRC/(-w^2 LC) = arc tan R/(-wL).
So as w → 0 what is arc tan R/(-wL)?

[Note carefully how I wrote the last equation. In general you have to respect the sign of the arc tan argument including whether the sign belongs in the numerator or denominator of the argument. In this case it doesn't matter but in general it does: arc tan (-x/y) is generally not the same as arc tan (x/-y).]

Draw the angle in polar coordinates to get your answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
82K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K