Calculate Radius of Wire in Air Wedge Formed by Glass Plates

  • Thread starter Thread starter U262241
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Wedge
AI Thread Summary
An air wedge is formed between two glass plates with a fine wire, and when illuminated with 688 nm light, 29 dark fringes are observed. The calculation involves using the formula t = (n * λ) / 2, where n is the number of dark fringes and λ is the wavelength. The initial calculation yielded a thickness of 9.976 micrometers, leading to a radius of 4.988 micrometers. However, a revision suggested that for the first dark fringe, n should be considered as 28, resulting in a new thickness of 9.63 micrometers and a radius of 4.82 micrometers. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the fringe count for accurate calculations.
U262241
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
An air wedge is formed between two glass plates separated at one edge by a ver fine wire. When the wedge is illumindated from above by 688 nm light, 29 dark fringes are observed. Calculate the radius of the wire. Show answer in micro meters

I have tried many different things with this problem and cannot come up with the correct answer. Here is the last thing I did. Since 39 dark fringes are seen; 39 light fringes will also be seen. Where t=0 will be the first dark fringe. Which means fringe 78 is a light fringe, which is right next to the wire separating the two glass plates. The formula is:

t = [((m - 1/2)*lamda) / 2] * 1e+6 micro m/m

This will give the diameter of t. Divide the diameter by 2 to get the radius. Unfortunately, this does not give the correct answer. What am I doing wrong. The answer I came up with is 13.158 micro meters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each time the fringes go from dark to light to dark again, by what fraction of a wavelength has the air gap increased?
 
Should it be +1/2 instead of -1/2?
 
No no, forget the freakin' formula for a second. Do you know how these fringes show up? THe two paths of light, one slightly longer, etc? Each time you get to another dark fringe, how much farther has the second ray of light traveled?
 
i using the formula with : 2t = n (w)

**P/s : w = wavelength , t = thickness

regarding ur ques --> w= 688nm , n (dark) = 29

hence,
t = (29*688nm) / 2
= 9.976 micro meter

Since the ques need ans in radius, therefore
t / 2 = 9.976/2
= 4.988 micro meter ( Ans )Done! Is it correct??
 
am i correct to say that since for the 1st dark fringe, we consider n=0, thus the value of n should be 28 instead of 29 ?

hence, making it:-

2 (t) = (28) (688*10^-9)

where t = 9.63 micrometer
and the radius is 4.82 micrometer ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top