Calculate rest mass given relative speed and kinetic energy?

AI Thread Summary
The correct rest mass calculated from the given kinetic energy is 3.079 x 10^-26 kg. The confusion arose from using the wrong formula for kinetic energy, as E=γmc^2 gives the correct total energy, while E=(γ-1)mc^2 is meant for kinetic energy. The discussion clarified that the question should consider 20 GeV as total energy rather than kinetic energy. Participants acknowledged the importance of correctly applying the formulas and subtracting one in the kinetic energy equation. Overall, the consensus is that the total energy approach yields the accurate rest mass.
bai_mi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The answer is 3.079*10^-26 kg

I tried doing E=mc^2
20*10^9*1.602*10^-19=m*(3*10^8)^2
m=3.56*10^-26 kg
However when I do E=γmc^2 I get the correct answer.

Is the question wrong, because isn't it 20 GeV of kinetic energy, not total energy?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Which of the formulas E=mc2 and E=(γ-1)mc2 represents the kinetic energy?
 
Sorry I meant that when I use E=γmc^2 (total energy formula), I get the correct answer. E=(γ-1)mc^2 (kinetic energy formula) gives the wrong answer.
The question should be 20 GeV of total energy, right?
 
When I use E = (γ-1)mc2 I get the answer that is given (3.079 x 10-26 kg). If you are not getting this, then show more details of your calculation.
 
20*10^9*1.602*10^-19= ((1/(root(1-0.5^2)))-1) m*(3*10^8)^2
m=2.30*10^-25 kg
 
bai_mi said:
20*10^9*1.602*10^-19= ((1/(root(1-0.5^2)))-1) m*(3*10^8)^2
OK

m=2.30*10^-25 kg
I don't get this value. The mistake must be in the manipulations to solve for m.
 
What do you get with E=γmc^2 then?
 
Yikes. MY FAULT! o:)

You are correct. E=γmc2 produces the given answer. Very Sorry. I kept forgetting to subract the 1 in (γ-1). So, yes, it appears that they took the 20 GeV to be the total energy.
 
Back
Top