Calculate the airplane's acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter ConfusedMonkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the airplane's downward acceleration based on the upward acceleration of pretzels observed during a downdraft. It is established that the airplane's reference frame is non-inertial, complicating the application of Newton's laws. The key insight is that for the pretzels to rise with an acceleration of 2 m/s², the airplane must be accelerating downward at 11.8 m/s², which is the sum of the gravitational acceleration (9.8 m/s²) and the pretzels' upward acceleration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding forces acting on both the airplane and the pretzels to arrive at this conclusion. Ultimately, the correct downward acceleration of the airplane is determined to be 11.8 m/s².
ConfusedMonkey
Messages
42
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Your airplane is caught in a brief, violent downdraft. To your amazement, pretzels rise vertically off your seatback tray, and you estimate their upward acceleration relative to the plane at ## 2 \hspace{0.1cm} m/s^2##. What's the plane's downward acceleration?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't think I need help with the math, but I do need help understanding what's going on here. I figure that we need to focus on the plane and not the pretzels because if we choose the reference frame to be inside of the airplane, then it isn't an inertial reference frame and so Newton's laws are no longer valid, correct?

So I figure that if the plane were to accelerate downward slowly, the pretzels would stay put, but if the plane were to accelerate downward very quickly, then the pretzels would jump up off of the tray. Since the pretzel's acceleration is ##2 \hspace{0.1cm} m/s^2##, then I need to find the maximum downward acceleration the plane can undergo without the pretzels jumping up, and I need to subtract ##2## from that (subtract instead of add because downward acceleration is negative). I just can't figure out how to get that number.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In free fall (acceleration of 1g down), what would happen?

PS. A lot of coordinate systems make acceleration down positive, so check what it is in the coordinate system you have.
 
  • Like
Likes ConfusedMonkey
You probably saw examples about elevators and the "change in weight" they can cause, you can also visualize what happens by just having a pen on top of your hand and then quickly moving your hand down, the pen won't catch up with your hand and it will "float" upwards if your frame of reference is actually your hand.
 
FactChecker said:
In free fall (acceleration of 1g down), what would happen?

PS. A lot of coordinate systems make acceleration down positive, so check what it is in the coordinate system you have.

If it were in free fall, the pretzels would still be on the tray because only gravity would be acting on the plane and on the pretzels. But there is nothing in the question to indicate free fall. From what I see, the forces on the plane are gravity, the force of the air which pushes the plane up, and the downward wind draft which is causing turbulence.

EDIT: If it were in free fall, the pretzels would remain on the tray since they too would also be in free fall, but if the plane all of a sudden started accelerating downward, then the pretzels would keep their initial acceleration of -9.8 m/s^2. This must mean that for the pretzels to appear as if they are rising with an acceleration of 2 m/s^2, then the plane must be accelerating downward at 9.8 + 2 = 11.8 m/s^2. But still, this is assuming it is in free fall, as I mentioned above, there are other forces to take into consideration.

EDIT 2: If the plane is accelerating downward, obviously the net force points downward. As long as the acceleration that the plane moves downward at is 9.8 m/s^2 or less, then the pretzels will fall at the same rate and thus NOT come off of the tray. However, as soon as the planes downward acceleration passes this point, then the pretzels MUST start to "rise". The fact that the pretzels appear to accelerate upward at 2 m/s^2 means thus means that the plane must be accelerating downward at 11.8 m/s^2. I think I've got it!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Yes, that should be the correct thought process
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top