Calculate the curvature and vectors T,N,B

  • Thread starter Thread starter skrat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Vectors
skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Let ##\Gamma ## be trajectory which we got from ##z=xy## and ##x^2+y^2=4##.

Calculate the curvature ##\kappa ## and vectors T, N and B (B is perpendicular to T and N).


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well, the hardest part here is of curse to find a parametrization of ##\Gamma ##.
Any ideas how can I do that? I tried using polar coordinates ##x=rcos\varphi ##, ##y=rsin\varphi ## and ##z=z##

buuut, this is obviously not good...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From x^2+ y^2= 4, an obvious parameterization is x= 2cos(t), y= 2sin(t). Then, from z= xy, z= 4 sin(t)cos(t).
 
well... that is exactly what I did but some really nasty expressions lead to the result. I guess it's ok.

One question, If the cylinder would be moved along x axis, let's say ##(x-2)^2+y^2=4## would than the parameterization be ##x=2cos(t)+2##, ##y=2sin(t)## and ##z=xy## ?
 
Also one more:
Catenary ##z=acosh(x/a)##, ##y=0## and ##x\in \left [ -a,a \right ]##

I tried with ##x=a(1-t)## that would mean that ##t\in \left [ 0,2\right ]## but I just have no idea what to do with z coordinate? :/
 
skrat said:
Also one more:
Catenary ##z=acosh(x/a)##, ##y=0## and ##x\in \left [ -a,a \right ]##

I tried with ##x=a(1-t)## that would mean that ##t\in \left [ 0,2\right ]## but I just have no idea what to do with z coordinate? :/
Why not just x = at? Can you calculate the curvature for that?
 
Haha, good point... it can easily be just x=at.

Actually, I have to calculate the moment of inertia for this catenary ##z=acosh(x/a), y=0 and ##x \in \left [ -a,a \right ]## but I didn't open another topic because the main problem here is still the parametrization.

But if you're asking about the original (first) post in this topic, than yes. I was able to calculate the curvature and vectors T,N, and B.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top