Calculate the flow through a plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter brkomir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Plane
brkomir
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let ##\vec{F}(x,y,z)## be defined as ##\vec{F}(x,y,z)=(-x+y^2+z^3,xe^y,-xze^y+z+1)## and plane ##\Sigma## defined with parameterization ##\vec{r}(u,v)=((1-u^2-v^2)(u^2+v^2)(sinh^3u+v)+u,v+(1-u^2-v^2)sinhu,-u^2-v^2+1)## where u,v are elements of a circle in point (0,0) with a radius 1. Orientation of ##\Sigma## is regulated in accordance with parametrization.

Calculate the flow of ##\vec{F}## through plane ##\Sigma##.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Hi there!

I have a problem... I have no idea how to start on this problem? I know that I can replace the x,y,z in ##\vec{F}## with u and v from parameterization ##\vec{r}## but this would give me some massive never ending calculations.

Any other way to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can one think of a relevant equation that describes a flow based on the flux through an area?

What is \vec{F}?

Is ##\vec{r}(u,v)=((1-u^2-v^2)(u^2+v^2)(sinh^3(u+v))+u,v+(1-u^2-v^2) sinh u,-u^2-v^2+1)## correct?
 
Astronuc said:
Can one think of a relevant equation that describes a flow based on the flux through an area?

What is \vec{F}?

Is ##\vec{r}(u,v)=((1-u^2-v^2)(u^2+v^2)(sinh^3(u+v))+u,v+(1-u^2-v^2) sinh u,-u^2-v^2+1)## correct?

You're probably talking about Gaussian law... but, to be honest with you, I don't know when am I allowed to use it...

Am... there is one little mistake (sorry for that).. it's ##\vec{r}(u,v)=((1-u^2-v^2)(u^2+v^2)(sinh^3(u)+v)+u,v+(1-u^2-v^2) sinh (u),-u^2-v^2+1)##
 
First, is that really a plane and not a curved surface? I'm not saying it isn't because I haven't checked, but a plane can be written in terms of linear[/b ] functions of the parameters but doesn't have to be . In any case, if it is a plane then the normal vector has constant direction.

The flow of \vec{F}(x,y,z)= f(x, y, z)\vec{i}+ g(x,y,z)\vec{j}+ h(x,y,z)\vec{k} through a surface is the integral of the dot product of \vec{F} and the unit normal vector to the surface at each point.

The "normal vector" to a surface given by \vec{r}(u,v) is given by the cross product of \vec{r_u}\times \vec{r_v}. The <b>unit</b> normal is, of course, that normal vector divided by its own length.
 
Aaam, I'm not sure if that is a plane or a curved surface. If I would have to guess i'd say it's a curved surface, however i am not really even sure how one can check that?

Ok, but I assume I have to change ##\vec{F}(x,y,z)## into ##\vec{F}(u,v)## or not?
 
##\vec{r}(u,v)=((1-u^2-v^2)(u^2+v^2)(sinh^3(u)+v)+u,v+(1-u^2-v^2) sinh (u),-u^2-v^2+1)##

Than ##\vec{r_u}=(-2u(u^2+v^2-1)(sinh^3(u)+v)-2u(u^2+v^2)(sinh^3(u))+v)-3(u^2+v^2-1)(u^2+v^2)sinh^2(u)cosh(u)+1,-(u^2+v^2-1)cosh(u)-2usinh(u),-2u)##

and

##\vec{r_v}=(-u^4+u^2(1-6v^2)-2v(2u^2+2v^2-1)sinh^3(u)-5v^4+3v^2,1-2vsinh(u),-2v)##

is there anything I can do before calculating the normal vector ##\vec{r_u}\times \vec{r_v}## ?? Please say yes :D
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top