Calculate the Flux through the Pipe

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Pipe
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the flux of water through a rectangular pipe, the relevant equation is Φ = ∫_S v · dA. The user expresses confusion about computing the surface integral and whether to apply the divergence theorem, given the problem's simplicity. It is clarified that if the velocity is uniform, the flux can be simplified to Φ = v * A, where A is the cross-sectional area of the pipe. The user confirms the calculation as Φ = v * s * l, indicating they understand the relationship between velocity, area, and flux. This foundational understanding will aid in tackling more complex parts of the problem involving varying velocities and angles.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Water flows with a speed v down a rectangular pipe of dimensions s and l as shown. What is the rate \Phi=volume\, per\, unit\, time
at which water accumulates in the bucket?

Photo2.jpg



Homework Equations


\Phi=\int_S\mathbf{v}\cdot d\mathbf{a}


The Attempt at a Solution



I am confused as to how to compute this integral. I do not see how could use the divergence theorem to simplify it since I only have the dimensions of the 2-dim surface of the rectangular pipe.

I am not sure how to evaluate the surface integral based solely on its definition. Can someone help to get me started?

Do I just use the definition \Phi=\int_S\mathbf{v}\cdot d\mathbf{a} for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any suggestions would be appreciated. :smile:
 
Sure, flux is integral v.dA. If the velocity is uniform that's just v*A. Isn't it? Why do you want to use the divergence theorem? This problem sure looks simple to me. Is this some kind of a trick?
 
Dick said:
Sure, flux is integral v.dA. If the velocity is uniform that's just v*A. Isn't it? Why do you want to use the divergence theorem? This problem sure looks simple to me. Is this some kind of a trick?

I just don't know anymore :sad: I think I am getting stupider and stupider.

I don't know what he is looking for (Griffith's Intro to Electrodynamics problem 1.32 2nd ed.).

I don't want to just memorize formulas. I want to compute the integrals. But I get all effed up when I get a surface integral no matter how simple. If I have to use the definition, I get all flustered.

How do I compute the integral?

I get,

\phi=\int_S v \cdot da
=\int_S v*da\cos\theta
=\int_S v*da
=\int_s\int_l v*(dsdl)=v*s*l

is that right?

The reason I want to do this right is that the next three parts of the problem have angles and $hit that I'll and non-uniform velocities that I will have to deal with.
 
Yes, that's right. It's v*A=v*s*l. cos(theta)=1.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top