Calculate the kinetic energy of the recoiling particle.

AI Thread Summary
A particle with a rest mass of 6x10^-30 kg emits a 2 MeV gamma ray, prompting the calculation of the recoiling particle's kinetic energy. The conservation of energy was applied, yielding an energy of 2.2x10^-13 J for the recoiling particle. However, there is confusion regarding the feasibility of the situation, as the particle's rest mass suggests it cannot emit a photon of that energy. It is proposed that the particle may transition from an excited state to its ground state, which would align with the energy constraints. Seeking clarification from the instructor on the problem's wording is recommended.
Gavins
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle of rest mass 6x10^-30 kg is at rest. It then emits a gamma ray of 2 MeV (3.2x10^-13). Calculate the kinetic energy of the recoiling particle.


Homework Equations


KE = (\gamma - 1)m_{0}c^{2}
E^{2} - p^{2}c^{2} = m_{0}^{2}c^{4}


The Attempt at a Solution


I used the conservation of energy to find the energy of the recoiling particle.
(6x10^-30)c^2 = 3.2x10^-13 + E
E = 2.2x10^-13

Then I used the conservation of momentum.
p = -(3.2x10^-13)/c = 1.06x10^-21

But I'm stuck. I try to put this in the energy-momentum invariant but it doesn't work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


One of your classmates posted this problem awhile back. Either the numbers don't work, meaning it's a physically impossible situation, or the wording is confusing or wrong. The way the problem is worded, it sounds like the particle has a rest mass of 6x10-30 kg=3.375 MeV/c2 before it emits the photon. If that's the case, however, it can't emit a 2 MeV photon. (At most, it can emit a photon of energy half the rest mass.) So the only interpretation that seems to make sense is that the particle is going from an excited state to its ground state, and its ground state rest mass is 6x10-30 kg.

Try solving the problem that way and ask your instructor for clarification about the wording.
 


Hm.. That's pretty bad since I found this on an final exam paper a few years back. Thanks anyway. I'm glad that it wasn't me who was wrong.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top