Calculate the Magnetic Vector Potential of a circular loop carrying a current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic vector potential of a circular loop carrying current, specifically addressing confusion around steps 3 and 4 of the process. Participants highlight the importance of symmetry in the integration due to the current being nonzero on the loop in the xy-plane. There is debate over the representation of the position vector and whether the denominator can be expressed as a dot product, with some expressing uncertainty about the inclusion of sine components. An alternative approach using Cartesian coordinates is suggested for simplification, which some find helpful. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of vector representation in cylindrical coordinates.
casparov
Messages
30
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Calculate the magnetic vector potential of a circular loop carrying a current
Relevant Equations
magnetic potential, cylindrical coordinates
Can someone explain what exactly happens at (4) ? I do not clearly follow, except that there is some cosine law going on?

I also do not really understand why at (3), r' doesnt have a z hat component, but I can live with that.
ED1.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to realize that the current I(r') is nonzero on a loop in the xy plane at radius R. This limits the integration and provides symmetry.
 
hutchphd said:
You need to realize that the current I(r') is nonzero on a loop in the xy plane at radius R. This limits the integration and provides symmetry.
I thought it was due to symmetry, just a bit confused why we keep it in the unprimed, but I guess it is part of the definition of the vector in cylindrical system.

Can you please be able to explain how step 4 is achieved ?
 
hutchphd said:
You need to realize that the current I(r') is nonzero on a loop in the xy plane at radius R.
Then write out the denominator as a dot product.
 
hutchphd said:
Then write out the denominator as a dot product.
But it is not really a dot product is it ?

If I do that then, I get just the cosines right, and not the sines part also then ?

I guess my confusion lies at this position vector stuff, I really do not grasp it well.
 
casparov said:
But it is not really a dot product is it ?

If I do that then, I get just the cosines right, and not the sines part also then ?

I guess my confusion lies at this position vector stuff, I really do not grasp it well.
The magnitude of a vector is the square root of the dot product of the vector with itself, so you have
$$\lvert \mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}| = \sqrt{(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'})\cdot (\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'})}$$
 
vela said:
The magnitude of a vector is the square root of the dot product of the vector with itself, so you have
$$\lvert \mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}| = \sqrt{(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'})\cdot (\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'})}$$
Thank you very much for the reminder
 
Hi @casparov. It might be worth noting an alternative (but less elegant) approach - use Cartesian coordinates:

##\mathbf{r}= <r \cos \phi, r \sin \phi, z>##

##\mathbf{r’}= <R\cos \phi’, R \sin \phi’, 0>##

##| \mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}|^2 = (r \cos \phi - R\cos \phi’)^2 + (r \sin \phi - R\sin \phi’)^2 + (z - 0)^2##

which easily simplifies to equation (4).

In some situations, using Cartesian coordinates might be a convenient choice.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes casparov and vanhees71
Back
Top