Calculate the range of S using Laplace Transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the range of values for \( s \) in the function \( f(t) = e^{-t/2}u(t) \) using the Laplace Transform. The initial approach involved integrating \( e^{-st}e^{-t/2}u(t) \) from 0 to infinity, resulting in \( \frac{2}{2s+1} \), which indicated that \( s > -0.5 \) to avoid discontinuity. However, using the Laplace Transform chart provided a different result, suggesting that the transform of \( e^{-t/2}u(t) \) is \( \frac{1}{s + 1/2} \), leading to confusion regarding the consistency of the two methods. The correct interpretation of the Laplace Transform is essential for determining the valid range of \( s \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace Transforms
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of integration techniques from 0 to infinity
  • Ability to interpret transform tables accurately
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of Laplace Transforms, focusing on exponential decay functions
  • Study the derivation and application of the Laplace Transform for piecewise functions
  • Learn how to use Laplace Transform tables effectively for quick reference
  • Practice solving differential equations using Laplace Transforms to reinforce understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students studying differential equations, engineers applying Laplace Transforms in system analysis, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of mathematical transforms in engineering contexts.

DODGEVIPER13
Messages
668
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the range of values for s: f(t)=e^(-t/2)u(t)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


what I did initially was to take the integral from 0 to infinity of e^(-st)e^(-t/2)u(t) dt this gave me 2/(2s+1) which when I sub in -.5 to find a divide by 0 or discontinuity then s>-.5. Then I realizeed I could do it by using the laplace transform chart so the transform of e^(-t/2)u(t) which gives s+(1/2) which gives (2s+1)/2 this is backwards from what I found earlier? I don't understand how the integral can be different from the transform but anyways if I plug in a negative .5 I would get 0 which would not be a discontinuity so it appears this way wouldn't work hmm any sugestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should check your transform table again. The entry for exponential decay should be of the form ##\frac{1}{s + \alpha}##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K