How Do You Calculate θ for Polarized Light Intensity Reduction to I0/4?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jraek1987
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angle θ for polarized light intensity reduction to Io/4, the intensity after passing through two polarizing sheets must be considered. Initially, the unpolarized light has intensity Io, which is reduced to Io/2 after the first polarizer. The intensity after the second polarizer is given by Io/4 = (Io/2) * cos²θ. Solving this leads to the equation 1/4 = (1/2) * cos²θ, which simplifies to cos²θ = 1/2. The correct angle θ is then cos⁻¹(1/√2), indicating the importance of accounting for the first polarizer's effect on intensity.
jraek1987
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An unpolarized beam of light has intensity Io. It is incident on two ideal polarizing sheets. The angle between the axes of polarization of these sheets is θ. Find θ if the emerging light has intensity Io/4.

Homework Equations


I = (1/2)Io

I = Io*cos^2θ

The Attempt at a Solution


If I = Io/4 then the second equation becomes:

Io/4 = Io*cos^2θ

Solving for θ gives:

(Io/4) = Io*cos^2θ
*1/Io {both sides}

1/4 = cos^2θ

√(1/4) = √(cos^2(θ))

1/2 = cosθ
*1/cos {both sides}

cos^-1(1/2) = θ

**The book gives the answer of cos^-1(1/√2) = θ

Not sure what I did wrong..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello jraek1987,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

jraek1987 said:

Homework Statement


An unpolarized beam of light has intensity Io. It is incident on two ideal polarizing sheets. The angle between the axes of polarization of these sheets is θ. Find θ if the emerging light has intensity Io/4.

Homework Equations


I = (1/2)Io

I = Io*cos^2θ

The Attempt at a Solution


If I = Io/4 then the second equation becomes:

Io/4 = Io*cos^2θ

Solving for θ gives:

(Io/4) = Io*cos^2θ
*1/Io {both sides}

1/4 = cos^2θ

√(1/4) = √(cos^2(θ))

1/2 = cosθ
*1/cos {both sides}

cos^-1(1/2) = θ

**The book gives the answer of cos^-1(1/√2) = θ

Not sure what I did wrong..
I0/4 is the intensity after the light passes through the second polarizer. I0 is the inensity of the light before it passes through the first polarizer.

You've neglected to take into account the intensity change caused by the first polarizer. (i.e. what is the intensity of the light in between the polarizers?)

(Hint: remember, the initial light I0 is unpolarized. :wink:)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top