Calculate Upper Scale Reading for Suspended 50kg Crate Using Spring Scales

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikefitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
A 50-kg crate suspended between the floor and ceiling using two spring scales has a lower scale reading of 121 N. The total weight of the crate is calculated to be 490 N, leading to confusion about why the upper scale reading isn't 369 N. The lower scale is not supporting the crate but instead pulling down on it, meaning the upper scale must account for both the weight of the crate and the force exerted by the lower scale. The discussion clarifies that the upper scale must exert a force equal to the crate's weight plus the force from the lower scale. The notes referenced are unrelated to this specific problem, which involves two springs rather than a pulley system.
mikefitz
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
A 50-kg crate is suspended between the floor and the ceiling using two spring scales, one attached to the ceiling and one to the floor. If the lower scale reads 121 N, what is the reading of the upper scale? Ignore the weight of the scales.

So, I convert 50kg to N and get 490
Then I subtract 121 from 490 and get 369 N

Why isn't the reading on the ceiling 369; wouldn't that make sense? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mikefitz said:
A 50-kg crate is suspended between the floor and the ceiling using two spring scales, one attached to the ceiling and one to the floor. If the lower scale reads 121 N, what is the reading of the upper scale? Ignore the weight of the scales.

So, I convert 50kg to N and get 490
Then I subtract 121 from 490 and get 369 N

Why isn't the reading on the ceiling 369; wouldn't that make sense? Thanks
Why did you subtract 121N? The lower scale is not supporting the crate, it's pulling down on it.
 
I thought the two readings would have to equal the total mass of the crate? My understanding of pulleys is really lacking, and these notes given to me from my teacher make little sense (he is not the best instructor and has failed to give me a good explanation for them)

Untitled-11.png
 
Those notes don't match the problem you describe. Where the heck did the pulleys come from? According to the question in the OP, there are two spring scales, one aboved and one below. Take away the word "scale" and you have two springs. ONe pulls up, one pulls down. The one above will have to pull up with the force equal to the weight of the crate plus the amount by which the lower spring pulls down.

The notes are for "Atwood's" machine, that's a different problem.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top