Calculating Activation Energy with Temperature and Time Data

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the activation energy (Ea) for cooking an egg at different altitudes based on boiling points and cooking times. The user is confused about how to apply the formula for Ea, which requires rate constants that depend on concentrations, when only temperatures and times are provided. They are advised to rearrange the activation energy equation to solve for Ea without needing to determine each rate constant individually. After performing calculations, the user arrives at an activation energy value of approximately 27,000 J/mol but receives feedback indicating it may be incorrect due to potential roundoff errors or a miscalculation. The user corrects a temperature conversion error in their calculations.
brandon1
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In Houston (near sea level), water boils at 100.0°C. In Cripple Creek, Colorado (near 9500 ft), it boils at 90.0°C. If it takes 5.6 min to cook an egg in Cripple Creek and 4.5 min in Houston, what is Ea for this process?What I do not understand is how I can figure this when the given formula for find Ea involves 2 unknown rate constants, and the formula for finding the rate constant given involves concentrations? So, how can I find the activation energy when given only 2 temperatures and 2 times?

Homework Equations



ln(k2/k1)=(-Ea/R)[(1/T2)-(1/T1)]^-1

k=rate1/(concetrations)

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure where to start...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, you have an equation for Ea... rearrange it to solve for Ea.

What variables do you know? What variables do you need?

hint: you might not have to solve for each k value individually
 
dmoravec said:
well, you have an equation for Ea... rearrange it to solve for Ea.

What variables do you know? What variables do you need?

hint: you might not have to solve for each k value individually

Ea=-R(ln k2/k1)[(1/T2)-(1/T1)]^-1

Ea=?
T2=363.0K
T1=372.0K
time1=336s
time2=270s
R=8.314 J/mol*k

Do I plug in the times for k? I am attempting it now, it looks as if it should still all cancel and leave me with J/mol which I want...
 
Ok, I came up with 27279.97791 J/mol corrected to 27000 J/mol for sig figs, but Webassign says I am wrong, and within 10% of the correct answer. "Your answer is within 10% of the correct value. This may be due to roundoff error, or you could have a mistake in your calculation. Carry out all intermediate results to at least four-digit accuracy to minimize roundoff error."Edit: I wrote a temp incorrectly in my conversion. Correct now!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top