Calculating Angular Acceleration of Wheel of Radius R Given Vector of Tot. Acc.

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angular acceleration of a wheel with radius R, given the total acceleration vector forms a pi/6 angle with the tangential acceleration, the relationship between the components of acceleration is crucial. The total acceleration can be expressed as a combination of radial and tangential components, leading to the equation involving angular acceleration. The discussion suggests using the dot product to derive the cosine of the angle, resulting in the expression for angular acceleration as dw/dt = sqrt(3)w^2. An alternative approach is proposed, indicating that the ratio of radial to tangential components could simplify the calculation using the tangent of the angle. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationships between angular and linear quantities in rotational motion.
peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
How may I calculate the angular acceleration of a wheel of radius R given that its vector of total acceleration of a point on its perimeter forms an angle of pi/6 wrt the tangential acceleration at that point at t=1sec after the body has begun its motion?

My attempt at a solution:

a_tot = (-r*w^2,r*dw/dt)
a_tang = (0,r*dw/dt)
Their dot product/product of lengths should yield cosine 30.
I got dw/dt = sqrt(3)w^2

Is that correct? Don't I also know that wt = (pi/2 - pi/6)? Couldn't I have calculated w using that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi peripatein! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
peripatein said:
a_tot = (-r*w^2,r*dw/dt)
a_tang = (0,r*dw/dt)
Their dot product/product of lengths should yield cosine 30.
I got dw/dt = sqrt(3)w^2

yes :smile:

but wouldn't it be easier to say that the ratio of the radial and tagential components must be tan30° ? :wink:
Don't I also know that wt = (pi/2 - pi/6)?

not following you :confused:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top