Calculating Angular Speed in a Rotating System with Sliding Rings

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular speed of a rotating system with a uniform rod and sliding rings. Initially, the system rotates at 35.0 revolutions per minute (rev/min), and the rings slide outward before flying off. The moment of inertia is calculated for both the initial and final states of the system, resulting in I1 and I2 values. The relationship between the initial and final angular speeds is established using the equation ω2 = ω1(I1/I2). The final angular speed, after the rings leave, is determined to be 2.27 rev/min.
lina29
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
A uniform rod of mass 2.95×10−2 kg and length 0.440 m rotates in a horizontal plane about a fixed axis through its center and perpendicular to the rod. Two small rings, each with mass 0.240 kg, are mounted so that they can slide along the rod. They are initially held by catches at positions a distance 4.70×10−2 m on each side from the center of the rod, and the system is rotating at an angular velocity 35.0 rev/min. Without otherwise changing the system, the catches are released, and the rings slide outward along the rod and fly off at the ends.

A-What is the angular speed of the system at the instant when the rings reach the ends of the rod?

B-What is the angular speed of the rod after the rings leave it?

Using these equations I get
I1 = (1/12)(m1)L² + 2(m2)r²=.00154
I2 = (1/12)(m1)L² + 2(m2)(L/2)²=.02371
ω2 = ω1(I1/I2)
I know the answer for a and b are the same I'm just confused how I use ω2 = ω1(I1/I2) to figure out the answer
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lina29 said:
I know the answer for a and b are the same I'm just confused how I use ω2 = ω1(I1/I2) to figure out the answer

Are you sure the answers are the same?
 
Yes. I figured it out though. I realized that I was given w1 and w2 = 35*[.00154/.02371] = 2.27 rpm.

Thanks though!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top