Calculating Angular Speed of a Falling Rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular speed of a falling rod pivoted at one end, utilizing conservation of mechanical energy. The initial potential energy is equated to the final kinetic energy, leading to the equation mgh = K. The center of mass is identified at 0.5 m, and the moment of inertia is initially miscalculated. After correcting the moment of inertia to I = 1/3 ML², the correct angular speed is determined to be 5.4 rad/s. The thread concludes with the participant successfully arriving at the right answer after reevaluating their calculations.
endeavor
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
A thin 1.0-m rod pivoted at one end falls (rotates) frictionlessly from a vertical position, starting from rest. What is the angular speed of the rod when it is horizontal? [Hint: Consider the center of mass and use the conservation of mechanical energy.]

So far I'm thinking that intial potential energy = final kinetic energy, so
mgh = K, where h = 0.5 m (the center of mass)

I can't seem to use K = 1/2 * Icm * w2 + 1/2 * M * vcm2
because I don't know vcm... or can I find it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you express w(cm) in terms of v(cm) and then solve the equation?
 
hmm.. i'll express v in terms of w instead...

mgh=.5Iw2 + .5M(rw)2
2mgh=Iw2 + Mr2w2
w2=(2mgh)/(I + Mr2)

h = 0.5m, I = 1/2 ML2, where L = 0.5m, r = 0.5m

so cancelling out M,
w2 = (2gh)/(1/2 * 0.52 + 0.52)
w = 5.1 rad/s

but the answer is supposed to be 5.4 rad/s...
 
Recheck your expression for the moment of inertia of a rod about its center of mass.

Realize that you can also treat the rod as being in pure rotation about the pivot, so:
m g h = 1/2 I \omega^2
(where I is the moment of inertia about the pivot)
 
Doc Al said:
Recheck your expression for the moment of inertia of a rod about its center of mass.
I should have used I = 1/3 ML2

thanks! I got the right answer now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top