Calculating Apparent Depth Using Snell's Law

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the apparent depth of a fish 80 cm below the surface using Snell's Law, the angle of refraction is found to be approximately 48.75 degrees. The discussion emphasizes that the angle in Snell's Law is measured from the normal of the water surface, which is nearly zero in this scenario. To determine the apparent depth, one must analyze the geometry of the situation, particularly using right triangles. The correct apparent depth, as concluded, is 60 cm. This calculation illustrates the impact of refraction on perceived depth when viewed from above the water.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



A fish is 80 cm below the surface of a pond. What is the apparent depth (in cm) when viewed from a position almost directly above the fish? (For water, n = 1.33.)

Homework Equations



Snell's law: n_1 sin \theta_1 = n_2 sin \theta_2

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I have found the angle of refraction in the water using Snell's law. Since they are asking for "a position almost directly above the fish", I took \theta_1 = 90.

1= 1.33 sin \theta_2

\theta_2 = 48.75

But I what else can I do?? I'm really stuck! I need to find the difference between he apparent and the real depth x, 80-x=apparent length. But how? Here's a diagram which shows a similar situation:

phys.gif


The correct answer is 60 cm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle in Snell's law is measured from the normal of the water surface, and it is near zero now.

ehild
 
ehild said:
The angle in Snell's law is measured from the normal of the water surface, and it is near zero now.

ehild

If this angle is zero, then what do I need to do to find the apparent depth?
 
It is not zero, just small.

ehild
 
Oh, okay. How does this help us to determine the apparent depth?
 
Look at the figure and find some right triangles.

ehild
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top