Calculating Average Acceleration from a Distance vs Time Graph | Lab Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter saad1109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around calculating average acceleration from a distance vs. time graph of a puck's motion on a slope. The user is attempting to determine acceleration by first calculating the velocity at various intervals, using the distance traveled and time taken. They provide specific velocity calculations for each interval and seek assistance in deriving the average acceleration from these values. The forum emphasizes the importance of showing work and understanding the concepts rather than simply asking for solutions. Ultimately, the user calculates an average acceleration of approximately 0.00099 m/s².
saad1109
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Graph of Motion Pls help urgent

Case: We are performing a lab in our class in which on a slop (made from books) is made. Then we graph the motion of a puck via a machine which places a parabola type curve on the graph lick a ticker tape timer. The points were plotted under the motion of the puck.
the question i would like for u to solve would be something like this:

In a

Distance vs Distance Graph, or Displacement vs Displacement graph,
given interval between each point is .05 seconds, how would you find the average acceleration or the acceleration of the object, if the graph looks like this :

ONLY LOOK AT HALF OF THE GRAPH, THAT IS THE RIGHT HALF & IGNORE ANY LABELLING.

http://xamplified.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/image0042.jpg


I WOULD DEEPLY BE THK YOU TO U IF U SOLVE THIS!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


You should read the forum rules regarding posting homework. You are supposed to show what you know and how far you can get, and then you'll get help to take you further. Asking for someone to just solve your problem for you isn't the way this forum works.
 


ohh sorry I'm new...i just didn't know...i tried it by getting the velocity between each points...given the distance and time between the points...but i am unable to go any further and find the acceleration
 


saad1109 said:
ohh sorry I'm new...i just didn't know...i tried it by getting the velocity between each points...given the distance and time between the points...but i am unable to go any further and find the acceleration

Show. Us. Your. Work.
 


ok would this work fine:


*Velocity of each interval:

V1 = 0.02m /0.05s = 0.4 m/s

V2 = 0.025m /0.05s = 0.5 m/s

V3 = 0.015m /0.05s = 0.3 m/s

V4 = 0.018m /0.05s = 0.36 m/s

V5 = 0.016m /0.05s = 0.32 m/s

V6 = 0.019m /0.05s = 0.38 m/s

V7 = 0.022m /0.05s = 0.44 m/s

V8 = 0.021m /0.05s = 0.42 m/s

V9 = 0.025m /0.05s = 0.5 m/s

*Vav =

0.4 m/s + 0.5 m/s + 0.3 m/s + 0.36 m/s + 0.32 m/s + 0.38 m/s + 0.44 m/s + 0.42 m/s + 0.5 m/s
9

= .402 m/s

* Total Distance = 0.02m + 0.025m + 0.015m + 0.018m + 0.016m + 0.019m + 0.022m + 0.025m
= .181m

* Total Time = .05 x 9
= .45 sec

Total Time Total Distance Average Velocity Acceleration
.45 sec .181m .402 m/s ?

Formulae: d = (v)(t) + ½(a)(t^2) or a = 2(d – (v)(t) / t^2)

a = 2(0.181 – (.402)(.45) / .45^2)
= 9.9 x (10^-3) m/s^2= or 0.00099 m/s^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top