Calculating Average Force in Nonelastic Collisions with No External Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter nhmockus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Momentum
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the average force during a nonelastic collision between a baseball and a bat, the relevant equation involves the change in momentum over the contact time. The baseball, weighing 0.145 kg, is pitched at 35.0 m/s and hit back at 57.0 m/s, leading to a change in velocity of 22 m/s. The correct calculation for average force is derived from the formula m*(v(f) - v(i))/Δt, where Δt is the contact time of 2.50×10^-3 s. Clarification was needed regarding the direction of velocity changes, emphasizing that the change in velocity can indeed be negative depending on the frame of reference. The final average force calculation should accurately reflect these considerations.
nhmockus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A 0.145-kg baseball pitched at 35.0m/s is hit on a horizontal line drive straight back toward the pitcher at 57.0 m/s.
If the contact time between bat and ball is 2.50×10−3s , calculate the average force between the ball and bat during contact.

The equation has something to do with nonelastic collisions but it has no external forces so it should have something like m*(v(f)-v(i)/change in t

I tried to plug and chug but it wasn't correct. ((57-22)*.145)/(2.5*(10^-3) The answer I came out with was 1276
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nhmockus said:
((57-22)*.145)/(2.5*(10^-3)

Where did the 22 come from?
 
Haha that's what i found. Sorry, it should be 57-35 to = 22. I did it correctly in my calculations
 
nhmockus said:
Haha that's what i found. Sorry, it should be 57-35 to = 22. I did it correctly in my calculations

Think about which direction the velocity is going in, are you sure the change in velocity is 57-35=22?
 
Why wouldn't it be? Or are you saying that it could be negative?
 
If I am traveling east at 5m/s, then I turn around and start traveling west at 3m/s, what is the change in my velocity?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top