Calculating Capacitance for a Light-Bulb and Capacitor Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter A90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
To determine the required capacitance for a light bulb with a resistance of 10 Ω and a maximum voltage of 3 V, the relationship between current, charge, and time must be utilized. The calculations involve Ohm's Law and the capacitor discharge equation, leading to an estimated capacitance of approximately 1.4 F for the circuit to keep the bulb glowing for over 10 seconds. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how current and charge relate over time in capacitor circuits. The user grapples with the variables involved, particularly in expressing charge without direct values. Ultimately, the calculations and equations confirm the necessary capacitance for the desired bulb performance.
A90
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Imagine that you have a light-bulb that has a resistance of about 10 Ω
and that can tolerate a maximum voltage of 3 V. Imagine that you want to connect this to a charged capacitor large enough to keep the bulb glowing reasonably brightly for more than 10s. Roughly what should the capacitor's capacitance be?

Homework Equations


I=(dQ)/(dt)
R=(\Delta\phi)/(I)
C=(Q)/(\Delta\phi)

The Attempt at a Solution


It looks like I need to know something about the charge to solve this, or I need to cancel it out, but I can't seem to make any headway. How can I solve for the capacitance without Q? Am I missing something obvious?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have Ohm's Law. You can use that to find the current (and therefore charge).
 
Is that assuming dQ=Q and dt=10? I get:
I=(Δϕ)/R=dQ/dt
then, dQ=I*dt=(Δϕ*dt)/(R*Δϕ)=dt/R=1

The answer is supposed to be 1.4 F
 
OK, for a discharging capacitor

I(t) = I_o e^{\frac{-t}{RC}}

Do you recognize this equation?
 
We have learned it with electric potential, rather than electric current, but I can see how one implies the other. With the data given I found I_0 (sorry, subscript keeps coming out as superscript- that is 'I naught') to be .3, but I'm not sure about I(t).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top