Calculating Capacitance of Isolated Capacitor with Conductor Inserted

voelkner
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An isolated capacitor with capacitance C = 1 µF has a charge Q = 29 µC on its plates

A conductor is inserted into the capacitor with thickness of the conductor is 1/3 the thickness of the capacitor and is centered in between the plates of the capacitor.

What is the capacitance of the capacitor with the conductor in place?

Homework Equations



C = Q/V

V = E*d

The Attempt at a Solution



I've been trying this problem for hours. I know that since the capacitor is a conductor it makes the distance between the two plates smaller which means that the capacitance should therefore increase. I thought that since we now had two distances that were each 1/3 the original distance the capacitance would increase by a factor of 6 however this answer does not work. Can anyone help me?!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
voelkner said:
I thought that since we now had two distances that were each 1/3 the original distance the capacitance would increase by a factor of 6 however this answer does not work. Can anyone help me?!?

Hi voelkner! :smile:

6 = 3 + 3 … isn't that for capacitors in parallel?

these capacitors are in series. :smile:
 
Would it then be 1/C?
 
voelkner said:
Would it then be 1/C?

1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2 :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top