Calculating Centripetal Acceleration for a Spinning Fairgrounds Ride

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mariesa Yeoman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the centripetal acceleration for a fairgrounds ride with an 8.00 m radius, the required acceleration is 1.95 times gravity, equating to 19.11 m/s². The angular velocity (ω) is derived from the formula ω = √(α/r), resulting in approximately 1.55 rad/s. The next step involves converting this angular velocity into revolutions per minute (rpm). Clarification on the calculation process emphasizes the importance of using the correct formula for centripetal acceleration. Understanding the relationship between linear and angular velocity is crucial for accurate results.
Mariesa Yeoman
Messages
14
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A fairgrounds ride spins its occupants inside a flying-saucer-shaped container. If the horizontal circular path the riders follow has a 8.00 m radius, at how many revolutions per minute will the riders be subjected to a centripetal acceleration 1.95 times that of gravity?

Homework Equations


α= 1.95*9.8m/s^2= 19.11
ω=ν/r

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I attempted this by solving for α =19.11m/s^2
Then ω=√19.11/8.00= 1.54 rad/s
And this is where I get stuck or confused, or maybe I haven't done it right at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mariesa Yeoman said:
= 1.54 rad/s
I get slightly nearer to 1.55rad/s.
It remains to convert to rpm. I would use a rad/sec value with some more digits for that, rounding afterwards.

Edit: it is not clear to me how you arrived at your answer, and you seem to be unsure yourself.
It is useful to remember a second form of the expression for centripetal acceleration: ##\frac {v^2}r=\omega^2r##.
 
That was exactly the problem! Thank you so much!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top