Calculating Charge on Capacitors in Parallel | 40 pF & 70 pF [SOLVED]

  • Thread starter Thread starter soccerj17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
AI Thread Summary
A 40 pF capacitor charged to 3 kV is connected in parallel with an uncharged 70 pF capacitor. The total charge remains constant after the connection, calculated as 120 nC from the initial capacitor. The voltage across both capacitors must be the same after they are connected, which is not the same as the initial voltage of the charged capacitor. The new voltage is determined using the equivalent capacitance of both capacitors, allowing for the calculation of the charge on the second capacitor. This approach correctly resolves the problem, confirming the importance of understanding charge conservation in parallel capacitor configurations.
soccerj17
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] capacitor problem

Homework Statement


A 40 pF capacitor is charged to 3 kV and then removed from the battery and connected in parallel to an uncharged 70 pF capacitor. What is the new charge on the second capacitor? Answer in units of nC.


Homework Equations


pF= 1 F x 10^-12
kV= 1 V x 10^3
nC= 1 C x 10^-9
Q = CV


The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that because they're connected in parallel that means the voltage is the same across them so I used Q=CV to find charge. For the second capacitor the capacitance is 70 x 10^-12 C and I used the voltage of 3 x 10^3 V. Multiplying them together I got
210 x 10^-9 or 210 nC. I submitted this online to our answer service and it was wrong, and I don't know what I did wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The voltage on capacitor #2 after you connect them is equal to the voltage on capacitor #1 after you connect them, but this is NOT equal to the voltage on capacitor #1 before you connect them, so you can't use the voltage of 3 x 10^3 V

Use the fact that the total charge on both capacitors doesn't change after the connection.
 
So total charge is the original capacitance (40 pF) times the 3 KV so 120 nC. Then I find voltage by V = Qtotal/Ceq which is C1 + C2 then i use that to find Q by using Q=CV?
 
Alright i got it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top