Calculating Coefficient of Friction for a Truck on an Incline

AI Thread Summary
A truck weighing 15 tonnes is rolling down a 15-degree incline after brake failure. The friction force acting on the truck's tires is calculated to be 38,046.4 N. The normal force is determined to be 141,991 N, leading to a coefficient of friction of 0.27. The calculations are based on the gravitational force and its components along the incline. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding friction in this context, despite some uncertainty about rolling friction.
menco
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A truck weighing 15 tonnes is traveling down an decline of 15 degrees at 6.6m in 3s. He then stops and gets out. The truck then begins to roll down the decline as the brakes have failed.

1. What is the size of friction force acting on the rubber tyres of the charging vehicle
2. Coefficient of friction between the rubber tyres and the coal surface.

Knowns/Unknowns
m=15000kg
angle = 15 degrees
d=6.6m
t=3s
g=9.8m/s^2
F(friction) = ?
Coefficient of friction = ?

(I don't think rolling friction is a part of this problem as we have not been taught it yet, but I could be wrong)

Homework Equations


Fg = ma
Fg(parallel)= Fg sin (15)
Fg(perpendicular) = Fg cos (15)
Coefficient = F(friction)/ F(normal)

The Attempt at a Solution


1. Fg = 15000 x 9.8 = 147000 N
Fg(parallel) = 147000 sin (15) = 38046.4 N

Therefore F(friction) is 38046.4 N

2. Fg(perpendicular) = 147000 cos (15) = 141991 N = F(normal)
Coefficient = F(friction)/F(normal) = 38046.4/141991 = 0.27

Therefore the coefficient of friction is 0.27.

Am I at least on the right track if I got it wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me, although I could be wrong.
 
Thanks for the response hopefully it is correct. I am just unsure if I am on the right track with Friction force
 
solved thanks can someone please delete?
 
We don't delete finished threads. They're kept for anyone who might search up similar questions in the future.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top