Calculating coefficient of resitution

  • Thread starter Thread starter JizzaDaMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficient
AI Thread Summary
The coefficient of restitution (COR) measures the elasticity of collisions between two objects rather than being an intrinsic property of each object. In the example of two balls, one with a COR of 0.8 and the other with 0.7 when bouncing off the ground, the ground serves as a common reference point. It raises the question of whether individual COR values can be assigned to each ball and how to calculate the COR during their collision. The discussion also touches on the concept that the COR can change based on the stiffness of the colliding objects, specifically noting that a less stiff ball can increase the COR from zero to one. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately analyzing collisions in physics.
JizzaDaMan
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I've been told that the coefficient of restitution is a little like friction; it's a measure of how elastic a collision is between two objects, it's not an individual property of each object itself.

Now let's say you have two balls bouncing on the ground. Ball 1 has a coefficient of restitution with the ground of 0.8, and ball 2 has a coefficient of 0.7 between itself and the ground.

This way you have the ground as a common reference. Is it then acceptable to assign a coefficient of restitution to each ball as an individual property?

Given this, is there then a way to calculate the coefficient of restitution in a collision between the two balls?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://physics.umd.edu/lecdem/services/refs_scanned_WIP/3%20-%20Vinit's%20LECDEM/C716/1/GetPDFServlet.pdf

Abstract

A perfectly happy ball is one that bounces to its original height when dropped on a massive, rigid
surface. A completely unhappy ball does not bounce at all. In the former case, the coefficient of
restitution COR is unity. In the latter case, the COR is zero. It is shown that when an unhappy ball
collides with a happy ball, the COR increases from zero to unity as the stiffness of the happy ball
decreases from infinity to zero...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't quite understand this phrase: "the COR increases from zero to unity as the stiffness of the happy ball
decreases from infinity to zero." or indeed it's implications.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top