Calculating concentration of product & mass of a precipitate

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass of calcium carbonate precipitate and the concentration of sodium nitrate produced, start with the balanced equation for the reaction between sodium carbonate and calcium nitrate. The reaction indicates that three moles of sodium carbonate react with one mole of calcium nitrate to produce three moles of calcium carbonate and two moles of sodium nitrate. Determine the moles of each reactant based on their concentrations and volumes, then identify the limiting reagent. Using the moles of the limiting reagent, calculate the mass of calcium carbonate formed and the resulting concentration of sodium nitrate in the solution. Understanding the stoichiometry of the reaction is crucial for these calculations.
lockandkey213
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The question is:
100 mL of 0.2 mol/L sodium carbonate solution and 200 mL of 0.1 mol/L calcium nitrate solution are mixed together. Calculate the mass of calcium carbonate that would precipitate and the concentration of the sodium nitrate solution that will be produced.

I believe the balanced equation would be: 3Na2CO3 + Ca3(NO3)2 ---> 3CaCO3 + 2Na3NO3
I'm not quite sure where to go from there. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a number of steps involved. A good idea is to write down what you know, what you don't know and how to obtain certain values (e.g. at the end, you need mass, how do you get mass from moles might be useful). Firstly, I am guessing it goes to completion? You know the number of moles that participates in a general reaction (3Na2CO3 + Ca3(NO3)2 ---> 3CaCO3 + 2Na3NO3), what does that tell you?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top