Calculating Cooling Rate for a Black Body in a Vacuum with a Radiation Screen

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the cooling rate of a black body in a vacuum with a radiation screen, the primary heat transfer mechanism is black body radiation, which follows the Stefan-Boltzmann law, proportional to T^4. The equations for heat transfer should account for the radiative heat loss from both the black body and the radiation screen. The cooling rate can be expressed as dQ/dt = e*σ*4πr²(T^4_sphere - T^4_vacuum), where e is emissivity and σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The impact of the thin shell can be considered negligible in some cases, but its influence on the overall cooling rate should not be dismissed entirely. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the system's cooling dynamics.
brainslush
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spherical black body with a radius r and a temperature T is placed in a spherical thin shell (radiation screen) with a radius R. The shell is also absolutely black on both sides. The space between the shell and the sphere and the space outer of the shell contain vacuum, i.e., no gas.
Find the cooling rate


Homework Equations



R = dQ / dT = h*A*dT


The Attempt at a Solution


The black body radiates heat with
h - some heat transfer constant
A - area of the radiating body

\frac{dQ}{dT}_{bb} = h_{vacuum} * 4 \Pi *r^{2} (T_{sphere} - T_{vacuum})

the same works for the radiation screen

\frac{dQ}{dT}_{rs} = h_{gas} * 4 \Pi *R^{2} (T_{vacuum} - T_{environment})

The point is that I'm not sure how to find the overall cooling rate of the system. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a vacuum, there will be no conduction or convection heat transfer (your equations are for convection). The only heat transfer mode will be black body radiation which is proportional to T^4.
 
Upps, I mixed up radiation, conductivity...

So

dQ/dt = e*\sigma*4\Pi*r^{2}(T^{4}_{sphere}-T^{4}_{vacuum})

but what about the radiation screen? It is a thin shell. Can I neglect it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top