Calculating Courses for Motorboat Travel with Constant Current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the courses for a motorboat traveling in a constant current. The boat moves at 8 km/h relative to the water, with a current of 4 km/h from north to south. The first course calculation yields a bearing of 165.5, while the book states it should be 135.5, leading to confusion over the angles in the velocity triangle. For the second course, the book suggests a bearing of 060, which seems incorrect since point C is directly west of B, prompting questions about the validity of the book's answers. The user seeks clarification on their calculations and the discrepancies with the book's solutions.
jiboom
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
a motorboat moving at 8km/h relative to the water travels from A to a point B 10km whose bearing from A is 150. it then travels to C,10km from B and due west of B. if there is a current of constant speed 4km/h from north to south,find the 2 courses to be set.


having a bit of trouble with the book answers here.

for first course i have set the relative velocity of boat to water at 150 to the north,
then velocity of Boat is 8 and v water is 4 pointing down.

in my velocity triangle i have v water going up at end of v rel which is at 150 to the vertical,then v b completes triangle.

now in this triangle i work out the angle to be 14.5,15.5,150. so my bearing will be

180-14.5=165.5 but the book answer is 135.5.

but to get this i need an angle of 44.5 in the velocity triangle,but one of those angles is 150...

so either I am doing it wrong or book is lying...





for the second course the book answer is 060 but how can this be?


C is due west of B so how can they set a course of 060?the current is only from north to souht,not east to west. i get the 60 in my velocity diagram but then need to add 180 to get bearing of 240.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any ideas?
 
cheeky bump/

having a lot of trouble with rel motion agaisnt a current. got all other questions in the exercise but these allude me. my methods must be ok if I am getting the non current questions right so only need a nudge in right direction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
904
Replies
9
Views
6K
Back
Top