Calculating Crane Power with Constant Velocity: Two Homework Problems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on two homework problems involving the calculation of power when lifting objects at constant velocity. For the first problem, the power used to lift a 91kg person 1.2m in 0.51s is calculated using the work done against gravity, resulting in approximately 2098.37W. The second problem involves lifting a 300kg piano to a height of 10m with a crane that has a power output of 400W, prompting a discussion on how to determine the time taken for this lift. The key point is that while the net force is zero at constant velocity, the work done against gravity must be considered to find the correct power and time. Understanding the relationship between work, force, and energy is crucial for solving these types of problems.
alex7298
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 problems.
1: A man lifts a 91kg person straight up a distance of 1.2m in 0.51s. What power is used to do this?

2: 3.00x10^2kg piano is lifted at a steady velocity from ground to a height of 10.0m. The crane doing the lifting has a steady power of 4.00x10^2W. What time does it take to do this?


Homework Equations


Both equations should be able to use P=Fd/t



The Attempt at a Solution


With both problems, the book states constant velocity so the F=ma=0, which doesn't make sense because that would make the answer 0.
Is there another way of finding force that i am forgetting?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alex7298 said:

Homework Statement


2 problems.
1: A man lifts a 91kg person straight up a distance of 1.2m in 0.51s. What power is used to do this?

2: 3.00x10^2kg piano is lifted at a steady velocity from ground to a height of 10.0m. The crane doing the lifting has a steady power of 4.00x10^2W. What time does it take to do this?


Homework Equations


Both equations should be able to use P=Fd/t



The Attempt at a Solution


With both problems, the book states constant velocity so the F=ma=0, which doesn't make sense because that would make the answer 0.
Is there another way of finding force that i am forgetting?
Thanks
That makes the net force and the net work = 0. But you're not looking for the net, you're looking for the work done by just one of the forces against gravity.
 
would I use GPE=mgh for the work?
so for problem 1: work=(91kg)(9.8)(1.2)=1070.16J===> P=1070.167J/0.51s=2098.366W?
 
alex7298 said:
would I use GPE=mgh for the work?
so for problem 1: work=(91kg)(9.8)(1.2)=1070.16J===> P=1070.167J/0.51s=2098.366W?
Yes, correct, as long as you understand why you are equating the work done by the man to the potential energy change of the person.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top