Calculating Crane Power with Constant Velocity: Two Homework Problems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on two homework problems involving the calculation of power when lifting objects at constant velocity. For the first problem, the power used to lift a 91kg person 1.2m in 0.51s is calculated using the work done against gravity, resulting in approximately 2098.37W. The second problem involves lifting a 300kg piano to a height of 10m with a crane that has a power output of 400W, prompting a discussion on how to determine the time taken for this lift. The key point is that while the net force is zero at constant velocity, the work done against gravity must be considered to find the correct power and time. Understanding the relationship between work, force, and energy is crucial for solving these types of problems.
alex7298
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 problems.
1: A man lifts a 91kg person straight up a distance of 1.2m in 0.51s. What power is used to do this?

2: 3.00x10^2kg piano is lifted at a steady velocity from ground to a height of 10.0m. The crane doing the lifting has a steady power of 4.00x10^2W. What time does it take to do this?


Homework Equations


Both equations should be able to use P=Fd/t



The Attempt at a Solution


With both problems, the book states constant velocity so the F=ma=0, which doesn't make sense because that would make the answer 0.
Is there another way of finding force that i am forgetting?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alex7298 said:

Homework Statement


2 problems.
1: A man lifts a 91kg person straight up a distance of 1.2m in 0.51s. What power is used to do this?

2: 3.00x10^2kg piano is lifted at a steady velocity from ground to a height of 10.0m. The crane doing the lifting has a steady power of 4.00x10^2W. What time does it take to do this?


Homework Equations


Both equations should be able to use P=Fd/t



The Attempt at a Solution


With both problems, the book states constant velocity so the F=ma=0, which doesn't make sense because that would make the answer 0.
Is there another way of finding force that i am forgetting?
Thanks
That makes the net force and the net work = 0. But you're not looking for the net, you're looking for the work done by just one of the forces against gravity.
 
would I use GPE=mgh for the work?
so for problem 1: work=(91kg)(9.8)(1.2)=1070.16J===> P=1070.167J/0.51s=2098.366W?
 
alex7298 said:
would I use GPE=mgh for the work?
so for problem 1: work=(91kg)(9.8)(1.2)=1070.16J===> P=1070.167J/0.51s=2098.366W?
Yes, correct, as long as you understand why you are equating the work done by the man to the potential energy change of the person.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top