Calculating Cross Section from Neutron Absorption in a Gold Foil

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total thermal neutron cross-section for gold (197Au) after a beam of thermal neutrons passes through a 2mm thick foil, resulting in a 70% reduction in neutrons. The participant attempts to apply the relevant equations but encounters discrepancies in their results compared to the professor's answer of 102 barns. They detail their calculations, including the determination of the number of nuclei per unit volume and the rearrangement of the exponential decay equation. A key point of confusion is whether to use mass in grams or kilograms, which affects the final cross-section results. The participant seeks clarification on their methodology and the correct units to use for accurate calculations.
Dovahkiin
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In an experiment carried out with a beam of thermal neutrons it is found that on traversing a 2mm thick foil of 197Au, some 70% of the neutrons are removed. What is the total thermal neutron cross-section for this isotope of gold? (Density of gold: 19300 kg m-3)

Homework Equations



1. N = N0 exp(-xnσ) - x is thickness, n is number of nuclei per unit volume, σ is cross section
2. moles = mass/A
3. n0 = Na x moles - Na is avagadros number, n0 is number of nuclei

The Attempt at a Solution



I have attempted this question and appear to have used the same method as in the solution given by the professor, but i get a different answer... Am i right?

Firstly, to find n i substitute equation 2 into 3, giving n0 = (Na x m)/A

Then i divide this by the volume: n = n0/V = (Na x m)/(A x V) = (Na/A) x ρ (ρ = density)

Next i rearrange eqn 1: N/N0 = (70%)/(100%) = 0.7 = exp(-xnσ)

This gives: σ = (-ln(0.7))/(xn)

Now I am not sure if i should be using m in grams or kilograms?

My answer:
σ = 3.02 x 10^(-30) m^2 = 0.0302 barns (using m in grams)
σ = 3.02 x 10^(-27) m^2 = 30.2 barns (using m in kg)

Neither of these answers matches the answer given, 102 barns...
Even though my method is identical to the professors method (although he gives no intermediate results, so i don't know if/where i have gone wrong...)

Any help is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't seem to be able to edit my OP anymore, but I've realized i haven't fully defined all the variables (units in brackets):

. N is the number of particles remaining after the foil
. N0 is the starting number of particles
. x is thickness (m)
. n is number of nuclei per unit volume (m^-3)
. σ is cross section (m^2)
. m is the mass (grams or kg?)
. A is the mass number
. Na is avagadros number
. n0 is number of nuclei
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top