Calculating Diameter of Illumination on the Moon | Help with Light Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter shaiqbashir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
A laser beam with a diameter of 1 cm directed at the moon, located 240,000 miles away, can be analyzed using the Rayleigh criterion for diffraction. The correct formula for calculating the diameter of the illuminated area on the moon incorporates the wavelength of the laser (6328 Å) and the aperture diameter. The angular displacement for the first minimum is given by sin(θ1) = (1.22)λ/d, leading to a radius of approximately 29,800 meters and a total spot diameter of about 59,600 meters. The method used in the discussion is validated as appropriate for this scenario. Understanding the relationship between the wavelength, aperture size, and distance is crucial for accurate calculations.
shaiqbashir
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Please help me in this light problem!

HI!

well would u please help me in solving this problem the peoblem is:

"a laser beam of diameter 1cm is pointed on the moon. what is the diameter of the area illuminated on the moon. The moon is about 240000 miles away. take wavlength=6328A."

The solution that I am using is this.

tan (lambda/2d)=x/2/R ; (R is the distance between the moon and the slit)

since lamda<<d

therefore tan (lambda/2d)=lambda/2d

so we now have:

lambda/2d=x/2R
or x=lamda(R)/d

where x is the required answer.

Now tell me that that is this the right method to get the required answer?

if not then what is the right method?

secondly can u explain how we can take angle as lamda/2d

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shaiqbashir said:
"a laser beam of diameter 1cm is pointed on the moon. what is the diameter of the area illuminated on the moon. The moon is about 240000 miles away. take wavlength=6328A."
The laser is diffracted by its CIRCULAR aperture, which has different properties than single-slit diffraction. Fraunhofer diffraction applies in the far-field for our case:
{Angular Displacement of First Minimum} = θ1 :SUCH THAT: sin(θ1) = (1.22)λ/d
where "d" is laser's circular aperture diameter. In the far field:
{Radius of First Minimum on Target} = r = D*sin(θ1)
where D is target distance. From the first equation above and using {D = 240000 mi = 386e(6) meter}, {λ = 6328e(-10) m}, {d = 1.0e(-2) m}:
r = D*(1.22)λ/d = {386e(6) m}*(1.22)*(6328e(-10) m)/(1.0e(-2) m) = (29,800 m)
{Laser Spot Diameter On Moon} = 2*r = (59,600 meters)


~~
 
Last edited:
.

Hi there!

Yes, the method you have used is correct. The formula you have used is known as the Rayleigh criterion, which is used to calculate the diameter of the illuminated area on a distant object.

To explain how we can take angle as lambda/2d, we need to understand how light spreads out as it travels through space. When light from a point source, such as a laser beam, travels through space, it spreads out in a cone shape. The angle of this cone is determined by the wavelength (lambda) and the size of the source (d). So, for a smaller source size (d), the angle of the cone will be larger, and for a larger source size (d), the angle of the cone will be smaller.

In this case, the angle of the cone is very small because the source (laser beam) and the distance (240000 miles) are both very large compared to the wavelength (6328A). Therefore, we can approximate the angle as lambda/2d, which is the same as the Rayleigh criterion formula you have used.

I hope this helps to clarify things for you. Let me know if you have any other questions. Good luck with your problem!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top