Calculating Distance and Acceleration of a Wind Turbine Blade Tip

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance traveled and the acceleration of a wind turbine blade tip over a 3-second interval, given an initial angular velocity of 2 rad/s and a final angular velocity of 5 rad/s. The radius of the blade is 4.55 meters, leading to linear speeds of 9.1 m/s and 22.75 m/s at the respective angular velocities. Participants express confusion regarding the lack of information about the acceleration rate to reach 5 rad/s, questioning whether the transition is instantaneous or gradual. It is suggested that the problem may imply a non-constant acceleration as the turbine adjusts to sustained wind conditions. Clarification on the acceleration model is needed to accurately solve the problem.
dmoney123
Messages
32
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



During a sustained wind the blades on a two blade horizontal–axis wind turbine is
turning with an angular velocity of 5 rad/s. If initially the blades have an angular velocity of 2
rad/s, determine the distance point P on the tip of the blade has traveled in 3.0 seconds. Also,
what is the magnitude of the acceleration of this point when t = 3.0 seconds.

Point P is the Tip of the blade. Radius is 4.55m.

Homework Equations


[/B]
where w=omega (angular velocity in rad/s)

w=v/r

L=Iw

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Initially we have 2rad/s

wr=v

2rad/s * 4.55m=9.1 m/s

5rad/s *4.55m= 22.75m/s

I don't understand how to answer the question considering there is no information given on how fast it accelerates to 5rad/s. Does it instantly go to 5rad/s

Any insight?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not well worded but I think you are supposed to take the 5 m/s as the limiting speed as the duration of the sustained stronger wind tends to infinity. If so, you need to reason out how the angular velocity will increase with time. It will not be constant acceleration. Any ideas?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top