Calculating Distance: Particle's Travel with Fixed Charge at 55cm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Myr73
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A particle with a mass of 2.50 x 10^-3 kg and a charge of -3.00 µC is fired towards a fixed charge of -4.00 µC from a distance of 55.0 cm. The key equations used in the calculations are kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE), specifically KE = PE and PE = kQ1Q2/r. The calculations suggest that the maximum distance the particle travels before stopping is approximately 0.38 m, leading to a return distance of about 0.55 m - 0.38 m. Participants in the discussion emphasize the importance of double-checking calculations and using algebraic methods for clarity. The final consensus indicates that the particle's travel distance is feasible based on the derived equations.
Myr73
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
A charge of -4.00uc is fixed in place. From a horizontal distance of 55.0cm a particle of mass 2.50 X 10^-3kg and charge -3.00uc is fired with an initial speed of 15.0m/s directly toward the fixed charge. How far does the particle travel before it stops and begins to return back?

q1= -4X 10^-6C d= 0.55m m=2.5 X 10^-3 kg q2= -3 x 10^-6 C
V0= 15 m/s x=? x= 0.55-r {r being the distance in between charge 2's maximum distance traveled(x) and charge 1}

Homework Equations



KE=PE Ke= 0.5mv^2 and then PE either is =q2V or = kQ1Q2/r



The Attempt at a Solution



So I would either do a) 0.5mv^2=q1V --> V= 0.5(2.5X 10^-3)(15^2)/(-4 x 10^-6)
and then --> r= V/kQ --> x= 0.55-r

or I'm thinking more likely b) 0.5mv^2=kQ1Q2/r --> r=kQ1Q2/0.5mv^2
--> x=0.55-r

I think it would be b) but I am unsure and would I just use the mass given of 2.5 X 10^-3kg? the charges wouldn't have a mass I guess -
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Myr73 said:
KE=PE Ke= 0.5mv^2 [STRIKE]and then PE either is =q2V or[/STRIKE] = kQ1Q2/r

That's really good right there.

You can use ##q_{2}V##, but you need a potential function for the electric field, and in my opinion, that's overkill for this problem.

Assuming you solved and plugged in the numbers correctly, you should get the right answer. That being said, I'm too lazy to sift through all those numbers. Next time solve it algebraically with symbals first, then go through and solve for your desired variable, and finally plug in the numbers.
 
sweet-
 
Ok, i thought I had it all right but the answer seems way wrong-->
KE=PE Ke= 0.5mv^2 and then PE = kQ1Q2/r m=2.50X10^3kg Q1= -4x10^-6 Q2= -3X10^-6 v=15.0m/s
0.5mv^2=kQ1Q2/r --> r=kQ1Q2/0.5mv^2=0.107856/281 250= 3.85 X 10^-7m
--> x=0.55-r= 0.55m-3.85 X 10^-7m=0.549m,
witch seems way to close the original distance 0.55m- Is that possible?
 
Myr73 said:
Ok, i thought I had it all right but the answer seems way wrong-->
KE=PE Ke= 0.5mv^2 and then PE = kQ1Q2/r m=2.50X10^3kg Q1= -4x10^-6 Q2= -3X10^-6 v=15.0m/s
0.5mv^2=kQ1Q2/r --> r=kQ1Q2/0.5mv^2=0.107856/281 250= 3.85 X 10^-7m
--> x=0.55-r= 0.55m-3.85 X 10^-7m=0.549m,
witch seems way to close the original distance 0.55m- Is that possible?

Hmm... I have the same equation you have: ##r = 2K\frac{q_1q_2}{mv^2}##, but when I plug in the values I get something slightly smaller for r. Double check your math for me, would ya?
 
alright-- so r=2k q1q2/mv^2 r= 2(8.988 x10^9) { (4 X10^-6)(3 x 10^-6)/( 2.5X10^3 x 15^2)

r= 1.798 X10^10 {(1.2 x 10^-11)/ 562 500} =1.798 X 10^10 {2.13 x 10^-17} = 3.84 x 10^-7

Witch for x would still give me 0.549m --> x=0.55-3.84 X 10^-7=0.5499

Ok please help me- What did I calculate wrong??
 
Alright well let's see...

##r = 2K\frac{q_1q_2}{mv^2}##
##r = 2*(8.988*10^9)\frac{(4*10^{-6})*(3*10^{-6})}{(2.5*10^{-3})(15^2)}##

group all the 10's together...

##\frac{2*4*3*8.988}{2.5*15^2} \frac{10^9*10^{-6}*10^{-6}}{10^{-3}}##

multiply all the 10's out and you get
##\frac{2*4*3*8.988}{2.5*15^2} * 10^0##
Multiply that fraction out and you should get .383488, take 2 sig figs (that's what you have in the problem) and that gives you r =.38m

now find the distance the particle travels.
 
Thanks ,it makes sense, all good now :)
 
cool no problem
 
Back
Top