Calculating Distance to Screen in Double Slit Diffraction Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance from the slits to the screen in a double slit diffraction experiment, given specific parameters. The user is confused about how to determine the value of m for the dark fringes and whether to use "delta m" between them. Clarification is provided that m represents the order of the fringe, with m=0 for the first dark fringe and m=1 for the second. Using these values allows for the derivation of expressions for the distance to the screen based on the known spacing between the dark fringes. Ultimately, the user gains clarity on the approach to solve the problem effectively.
solomar
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Light of wavelength 460nm falls on two slits spaced .3 mm apart. What is the required distance from the slit to a screen if the spacing between the first and second dark fringes is to be 4mm?

Homework Equations



dsin(theta)=(m+1/2)lambda
where d = .3mm
y=4mm
lambda = 460nm
sin(theta)=y/L

The Attempt at a Solution


My problem is I don't understand what to use for m...delta m between the two dark fringes? (3/2-1/2), what am I supposed to use for m?
Using delta m I get:
L=dy/deltam*lambda
L=2.609 meters
Basically all I would really like to know is what in the world do I use for m?
also I am unsure if I am approaching this correctly, do I need to somehow incorporate approximation with small angles? If so, how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dsin(theta) = (m+1/2)(lambda)

So at m = 0, you get the first dark fringe. At m = 1, you get the second dark fringe.

I don't think "delta m" has any meaning in this context.
 
quanticism said:
dsin(theta) = (m+1/2)(lambda)

So at m = 0, you get the first dark fringe. At m = 1, you get the second dark fringe.

I don't think "delta m" has any meaning in this context.

So then using those two values for m I would receive two different values for L. I don't see how having those two lengths solved would help me find the distance to the screen at all. I'm sorry I just don't understand how this leads to a solution...
 
dsin(theta) = (m+1/2)(lambda)
d(y/L) = (m+1/2)(lambda)

Here, m gives you the "order" of the fringe, L is the distance from the slit and y is the vertical distance from the center of the screen to the dark fringe.

When you sub m=0 and all your known data in, you obtain an expression for y and L. Here, y is the distance to the first dark fringe.

Similarly, sub m=1 in and you obtain another expression involving y and L. This time, y is the distance to the second dark fringe.

The question gives you the separation between the first and second dark fringe so I'm sure you can work it out from there.
 
There we go! For some reason it wasn't quite clicking with me...but I definitely got it now, thank you very much :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top