Calculating Efficiency of Otto Cycle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on comparing the theoretical and experimental efficiencies of a single-cylinder Otto cycle, with recorded theoretical efficiencies of 20% and 13.3%. To calculate actual efficiency, the team measured various parameters while running the system under load, including RPM, horsepower, torque, and temperatures. The equation eff = 1 - (T4-T1)/(T3-T2) was initially considered but clarified to apply only to ideal cycles, not actual efficiency. Actual efficiency can be determined by the power absorbed by the dynamometer and the energy input from fuel, calculated using the calorific value and fuel mass consumption. Suggestions included using a flow meter or monitoring changes in fuel tank levels to measure fuel consumption accurately.
mblair90
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
My team has recorded information on a single cylinder Otto cycle from a lab we have done. We are supposed to compare the theoretical efficiency of the cycle to the experimental efficiency. Using a given compression ratio of 3 and the ratio of specific heats for the fuels we used we were able to come up with theoretical efficiencies of 20% and 13.3% (from eff. = 1 - 1/r^(gamma - 1)). The question at hand is how to calculate the actual experimental efficiencies. What we did exactly was get the system running at a steady RPM then slowly apply a load to the system in order to measure horsepower. We recorded the RPM, HP, torque, air/fuel ratio, exhaust gas temperature, and cylinder head temperature during the runs. Would the equation eff = 1 - (T4-T1)/(T3-T2) be applicable to find the actual efficiency?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, eff = 1 - (T4-T1)/(T3-T2) should give you the actual efficiency.
 
No, that would give you the efficiency of the ideal cycle.

Your actual efficiency can be calculated from the power absorbed by your dyno and the amount of energy you're putting in as fuel.
 
Any info on how to calculate the energy from fuel?
 
The heat you're putting in as fuel is the calorific value (kJ/kg) multiplied by the fuel mass consumption.

Get your calorific value off the fuel supplier (or approximate it for 'shop' fuel).
 
brewnog said:
No, that would give you the efficiency of the ideal cycle.

Your actual efficiency can be calculated from the power absorbed by your dyno and the amount of energy you're putting in as fuel.
Correct, my mistake. That expression comes out of an ideal cycle.

I was going to suggest figuring the actual energy from fuel, but in the back of my mind I was thinking they may not be set up to measure fuel consumption rate. A simple flow meter would do, however, or even change in tank level per unit time.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
Back
Top