Calculating Efficiency of Otto Cycle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on comparing the theoretical and experimental efficiencies of a single-cylinder Otto cycle, with recorded theoretical efficiencies of 20% and 13.3%. To calculate actual efficiency, the team measured various parameters while running the system under load, including RPM, horsepower, torque, and temperatures. The equation eff = 1 - (T4-T1)/(T3-T2) was initially considered but clarified to apply only to ideal cycles, not actual efficiency. Actual efficiency can be determined by the power absorbed by the dynamometer and the energy input from fuel, calculated using the calorific value and fuel mass consumption. Suggestions included using a flow meter or monitoring changes in fuel tank levels to measure fuel consumption accurately.
mblair90
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
My team has recorded information on a single cylinder Otto cycle from a lab we have done. We are supposed to compare the theoretical efficiency of the cycle to the experimental efficiency. Using a given compression ratio of 3 and the ratio of specific heats for the fuels we used we were able to come up with theoretical efficiencies of 20% and 13.3% (from eff. = 1 - 1/r^(gamma - 1)). The question at hand is how to calculate the actual experimental efficiencies. What we did exactly was get the system running at a steady RPM then slowly apply a load to the system in order to measure horsepower. We recorded the RPM, HP, torque, air/fuel ratio, exhaust gas temperature, and cylinder head temperature during the runs. Would the equation eff = 1 - (T4-T1)/(T3-T2) be applicable to find the actual efficiency?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, eff = 1 - (T4-T1)/(T3-T2) should give you the actual efficiency.
 
No, that would give you the efficiency of the ideal cycle.

Your actual efficiency can be calculated from the power absorbed by your dyno and the amount of energy you're putting in as fuel.
 
Any info on how to calculate the energy from fuel?
 
The heat you're putting in as fuel is the calorific value (kJ/kg) multiplied by the fuel mass consumption.

Get your calorific value off the fuel supplier (or approximate it for 'shop' fuel).
 
brewnog said:
No, that would give you the efficiency of the ideal cycle.

Your actual efficiency can be calculated from the power absorbed by your dyno and the amount of energy you're putting in as fuel.
Correct, my mistake. That expression comes out of an ideal cycle.

I was going to suggest figuring the actual energy from fuel, but in the back of my mind I was thinking they may not be set up to measure fuel consumption rate. A simple flow meter would do, however, or even change in tank level per unit time.
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Back
Top