Calculating Electric Field for Infinite Plane Slab with Uniform Charge Density

Midas_Touch
Problem: An infinite plane slab, of thickness 2d carries a uniform charge density rho. Find the electric field as a function of y, where y=0 at the center. Plot E versus y calling E positive when it point in the +y direction and negative when it points in the -y direction.

Okay, so I worked out the electric field, which gave me
E = 2d*rho/epsilon_0

Does this look right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The field is not constant for -d < y < d.
 
Tide said:
No. The field is not constant for -d < y < d.

I used the integral of E.da = Qenc/epsilon_0

E.4d^2 = rho*8d^3/epsilon

What am I doing wrong?
 
Set up a "pill box" (cylinder) whose center is at y = 0 and whose flat faces are parallel to the plane y = 0 and equidistant from it. By symmetry, the electric field is perpendicular to the flat surfaces (but perpendicular to the curved surface) so the only contribution to the flux is from the flat faces.

That flux is related to the total charge enclosed by the surface (Gauss' Law) and depends on the height of the pill box. Clearly, when the height of the box is 0 then the charge enclosed is also zero so the flux and electric field at y = 0 is 0. If you make the box taller, then the amount of charge it contains increases. You need to figure out how much charge is contained and it will be proportional to 2xE(y) x Area of flat surfaces.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top