Calculating Electric Fields Using Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field at points A and B due to two positive charges using Coulomb's Law, first determine the electric field contributions from each charge separately. The electric field E can be expressed as E = (Q * r̂) / (4πε₀ * r²), where r̂ is the unit vector pointing from the charge to the point of interest. After calculating the magnitudes, resolve the electric fields into their x and y components using trigonometric functions. Finally, use vector superposition to combine these components for the resultant electric field at each point. Understanding these steps is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
AbbyGirl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use Coulomb's law to determine the magnitude and direction of the electric field at points A and B in Fig. 16-57 due to the two positive charges (Q = 4.0 µC) shown.

123.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



Basically, I'm completely lost. I've applied Coulomb's law to find the magnitudes of the contributing electric fields.

Can anyone help me solve this problem/ at least get started. Thanks so much, god bless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply Coulomb's law for each charge separately.
Then use vector superposition once you find electric field for each charge.
 
An electric field is a vector so it has a magnitude and a direction. Using Coulomb's Law gives an expression for E:

\vec{E}=\frac{\vec{F}}{q}\mbox{ where q is a test charge}

\vec{F}=\frac{qQ\hat{r}}{4\pi \varepsilon_0 \ r^2}

\mbox{where }\hat{r}\mbox{ is the unit vector in the r direction}

So,

\vec{E}=\frac{Q\hat{r}}{4\pi \varepsilon_0 \ r^2}

where r is the distance from the charge to the point in question. Resolve E into Ex and Ey using cosine and sine. Then add these resolved components to find the resultant components.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top