Calculating electric flux with a constant electric field

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric flux through the bottom of a car in a vertical electric field of 2 x 10^4 N/C, the formula Eflux = E * (A cos θ) is used, where A is the area of the car and θ is the angle of the surface relative to the field. The car's dimensions are 3.00 m by 1.50 m, and with an angle of 7°, the calculated electric flux is approximately 89,329 Nm^2/C. The discussion raises questions about the relevance of the thunderstorm to the electric field and whether the angle affects the flux through different surfaces with the same horizontal area. It concludes that the key is finding the effective area exposed to the electric field and multiplying it by the field strength. The calculations and concepts presented are straightforward and emphasize the uniform nature of the electric field.
NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A vertical electric field of magnitude 2 X 10^4 N/C exists above the Earth's surface on a day when a thunderstorm is brewing. A car with a rectangular size of 3.00 m by 1.50 m is traveling along a dry gravel roadway sloping downward at 7.0°. Determine the electric flux through the bottom of the car.

Homework Equations



Eflux = E*(A cos theta)

The Attempt at a Solution



(2*10^4)*(3*1.5)*(cos 7) = 89,329 Nm^2/C = 8.93*10^4 Nm^2/C

Is this correct? It seems pretty straightforward to me, but I can't help think that there is some trick in the question that I'm not seeing.

Flux through a surface perpendicular to the electric field obviously has cos 90 = 0 as the angle angle associated with it so it would just be Eflux = E*A, but there is an angle here, so it would simply be cos 7. Does the thunderstorm brewing have any bearing on the equations affecting the answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems the thunderstorm that is brewing is the source of the E field, and is just a little back story.

Have a quick thought about it. The X flux is the amount of X going through a surface area, correct?

If the field is uniform and verticle, will there be a difference between the flux through a horizontal surface A and a surface B, if surface B's horizontal componant of area (oh gawd did I just slaughter that phrase, but I hope you get my point) is the same as surface A?

For example, if there is a sheet area 1m by 3m held horizontally in a rain storm (assuming uniform verticle rain) will it's dry patch be the same area as a 1m by 5m sheet held at 53* (or whatever the angle in a 3,4,5 triangle is)?

So you are really just finding the surface area seen by the uniform field, then multiplying that by the strength of that field. It is very simple.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top