Calculating EMF Induced Current in a Circular Loop of Wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the induced electromotive force (emf) in a circular loop of wire due to a changing magnetic field. The magnetic field changes from +0.52 T to -0.45 T over 175 ms, and the formula for emf is applied to find a value of 5.54 V. It is clarified that a negative sign should be included in the answer due to Lenz's law, which indicates the direction of induced current. Additionally, the relationship between the magnetic field and magnetic flux is emphasized, noting that the area of the loop affects the induced emf. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving problems related to electromagnetic induction.
metalmagik
Messages
130
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The magnetic field perpendicular to a circular loop of wire 23 cm in diameter is changed from +0.52 T to -0.45 T in 175 ms, where + means the field points away from an observer and - toward the observer.


Homework Equations



(pardon me with the equations, I am LaTeX challenged.)

emf = N x (delta flux)/(delta time)

emf = Blv

The Attempt at a Solution



emf = (1) (.97)/(.175)

emf = 5.54 V

I have seen this equation with a negative infront...does this need to be put in the answer? This is for a WebAssign. I apologize for the rushed manner in which I posted this, but I have a ton of other work to do. Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V = -N \frac{d\phi}{dt}

So first, yes, there is a negative sign in front. Second, what is the equation that relates the B field to the flux \phi ?
 
The induced emf in a coil also depends on the area it presents to the changing manetic field through it. So the flux is the product of the magnetic field and the area perpendicular to the magnetic field lines. That is why the induced emf changes as the coils of a generator turns in the constant magnetic field - the area they present to the magnetic field lines changes as they revolve in the field.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top