Calculating Energy Expenditure for Weight Loss Through Stair Climbing

  • Thread starter Thread starter xX1SHOt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy expenditure for weight loss through stair climbing. The student aims to lose weight by running up and down a flight of stairs, and the calculations involve understanding energy conversion and efficiency. It is established that only 20% of the energy from metabolizing fat is converted into mechanical work for climbing stairs. The total work done to climb 100 steps is calculated using the formula for potential energy, but there is confusion regarding the correct interpretation of energy percentages and the height calculation. Clarifications are provided on the calculations and the importance of accurately determining the total height climbed.
xX1SHOt
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Energy is conventionally measured in Calories as well as in joules. One Calorie in nutrition is one kilocalorie, defined as 1 kcal = 4186 J. Metabolizing 1 g of fat can release 9.00 kcal. A student decides to try to lose weight by exercising. She plans to run up and down the stairs in a football stadium as fast as she can and as many times as necessary. Is this in itself a practical way to lose weight? To evaluate the program, suppose she runs up a flight of 100 steps, each 0.150 m high, in 59.5 s. For simplicity, ignore the energy she uses in coming down (which is small). Assume that a typical efficiency for human muscles is 20.0%. Therefore when your body converts 100 J from metabolizing fat, 20 J goes into doing mechanical work (here, climbing stairs). The remainder goes into extra internal energy. Assume that the student's mass is 54.0 kg.
(a) How many times must she run the flight of stairs to lose 1 lb of fat?


Homework Equations



work = F*d which equals the same as total potential energy PE = mgh


The Attempt at a Solution



ok i interpreted it as only 20% of work burns fat, if that's wrong that'd be nice to know.

(54 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(15) = 7938 J

1lb = .4536 kg

.2 * 9kcal/g * 1000g/kg * 1kg/2.2046lbs * 4186J/kcal * 1walk/7938J = 430.56 walks/lb

i messed up a calculation and entered 2152.78 walks/lb the first time and it said that i was between 10% and 100% of the correct answer. Does what i just showed make sense and if it at least the calculations are correct is it wrong where i thought 20% of energy used burns fat? or maybe its 80% ? or maybe its 120%?

any thoughts would be helpful as i only have one more chance to answer before its permanently wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xX1SHOt said:
ok i interpreted it as only 20% of work burns fat, if that's wrong that'd be nice to know.
Yep, it's wrong. Did you see this sentence:
xX1SHOt said:
Therefore when your body converts 100 J from metabolizing fat, 20 J goes into doing mechanical work (here, climbing stairs).

Also, in
xX1SHOt said:
(54 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(15) = 7938 J
Where did 15 come from?
 
15 is the total height being walked up .15m per step * 100 steps = 15
her mass is 54kg and acceleration is 9.8m/s^2.
the total energy or work it takes to get to the top is Fd.
do you have a different way to determine the total distance?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top