Calculating Energy in a Quantum Chemistry System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the second lowest energy measurement in a quantum chemistry system defined by the wave function Psi(x) = Ax(b/2 - x) for 0 < x < b/2 and Psi(x) = 0 for b/2 < x < b. The user is uncertain whether to treat the system as a box of width b or b/2 for energy state calculations. They aim to find the probability of measuring energy E2 by expanding the initial state in terms of the energy operator's eigenfunctions, specifically using the sine function derived for a box of width b. The key challenge is determining the correct width for the box and ensuring the proper incorporation of wave equations. Clarification on these points is sought to confirm the approach is valid.
Knight
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
There is an initial state Psi(x) =Ax(b/2 - x) when 0< x <b/2 and Psi(x) = 0 when b/2 < x <b

I have to find the second lowest value possibly be obtained in a measurement of the energy.

Should I treat this as a box with width b and possible energy states E=n^2*h^2/8mb^2 ? Or should I use the width b/2 ?

Could someone please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you going to incorporate the wave equations?
 
Let me explain this problem better.
What I have to do is calculate the propability that the measured energy from this system is E2
O.K. So I have to find the Fourier coefficients, when I expand the initial state I mentioned above from 0 to b/2 in the eigenfunctions of the energy operator, or sqrt(2/b)*sin(n*pi*x/b). I know these eigenfunctions are derived from x=0 to x=b but Psi(x) =Ax(b/2 - x) is when 0< x <b/2
I am doing this the correct way or am I way off?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top