Calculating equilibrium point of a network of springs

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the equilibrium position of a network of springs with fixed points in 3D space, one must consider the net forces acting on the connection point of the springs. The equilibrium condition requires that the sum of forces in the x, y, and z directions equals zero, leading to three simultaneous equations. However, determining the force vector for each spring is challenging without knowing the equilibrium point, complicating the calculations. A valid equilibrium point must also correspond to a minimum in the total potential energy of the system, distinguishing it from other mathematical solutions. The user has developed a simplified solver for their specific case but seeks further methods for calculation without simulation.
o_z
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to find a way to calculate the resting position of a network of springs that is built as follows: n number of springs with identical k constant, but with different resting lengths are connected together at one end of each spring. The other end of each spring is fixed to some point in 3d space - meaning, that position cannot change by the spring, only the end that is connected to all the other springs can move.
Now, if I move the fixed positions of all/some of the springs, how can I calculate the resting (equilibrium) position in space of the point in which all springs are connected?


Thanks in advance,
Ofer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the "floating point". Each spring yields a force with an x component , a y component, and a z component. If we sum all the x components, we get the net force in the x direction. Likewise for y & z.

For the "floating point" to be in equilibrium, the net force in each direction (x,y,z) should be zero. Therefore we have three equations that we have to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simultaneous_equations" :

Net force in x direction = 0
Net force in y direction = 0
Net force in z direction = 0

We have three equations and three unknowns (the coordinates of the floating point). Therefore we can solve these equations to get the equilibrium position of the floating point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Note however that not all solutions are valid equilibrium points.

For example consider the case where the fixed points are distributed on a circle with equal angular spacings. Then if the springs are under tension, the centre of the circle is an equilibrium point. However if the springs are in compression, then the centre point, though a solution to the equations above, is not a valid equilibrium point since it is unstable. What determines whether a solution to the above is a true equilibrium point is whether the point corresponds to a minima of the total potential energy of the system (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_total_potential_energy_principle" )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the replies!

The basic problem I'm having is: how do I know the force that each spring yields if I don't know the equilibrium point? What I mean is, I know the force's strength, but not it's vector. So how can I solve those equations without knowing the different x,y and z elements of the force?

In the mean time, I've written a simplified spring network solver for this specific case, that seems to solve the issue for my needs. But I'm still interested in knowing if there's a way to calculate that without simulation.

Thanks,
o
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top