Calculating Final Body Temperature After Soda Consumption

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final body temperature after a person consumes a cold soft drink. The individual weighs 70 kg and starts with a body temperature of 37°C, while the soda is at 12°C. Participants emphasize using the correct specific heat capacity for the soda, which is primarily water, and calculating its mass based on the volume provided. There is a debate about whether the temperature change would be significant enough to register on a medical thermometer, with some arguing it would not be measurable. The conversation highlights the importance of proper calculations and understanding of thermal equilibrium in this context.
doggieslover
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Before going in for an annual physical, a 70.0-{\rm kg} person whose body temperature is 37.0{\rm ^{\circ} C} consumes an entire 0.355-{\rm liter} can of a soft drink (which is mostly water) at 12.0{\rm ^{\circ} C}.

Part A
What will be the person's body temperature T_final after equilibrium is attained? Ignore any heating by the person's metabolism. The specific heat capacity of a human body is 3480 {\rm J/kg \cdot K}.

I tried m_1c_1deltaT_1+m_2c_2deltaT_2=0
I got stuck here:
(70kg)(3480J/kgK)(T_f-37) + (70kg)(what is the specific heat for soda?)(Is this just 12C?)

Part B
Is the change in the person's body temperature great enough to be measured by a medical thermometer? (A high-quality medical thermometer can measure temperature changes as small as 0.1{\rm ^{\circ}C} or less.)

yes or no?

I don't really get what they are asking here, I want to say NO, because logically speaking, drinking soda wouldn't lower your body temperature drastically. . . ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part A.

I have 2 observations:

1. The problem statement says what material the soda is (mostly) made of, so use the specific heat for that material.

2. The soda is not 70 kg. You'll have to figure out its mass from the information given in the problem statement.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top