Calculating Flight Time for Birds in Windy Conditions

AI Thread Summary
Canadian geese migrate over long distances, flying at speeds up to 100 km/h, and must account for wind when traveling. To fly directly south in a 42.0 km/h eastward wind, the bird should head at an angle of 24.8 degrees relative to the north-south direction. The incorrect calculation for the time to cover 600 km stemmed from misapplying the Pythagorean theorem. The correct method involves identifying the right sides of the triangle formed by the bird's speed and wind speed. The community emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations and offers supportive guidance.
Ecterine
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Canadian geese migrate essentially along a north-south direction for well over a thousand kilometers in some cases, traveling at speeds up to about 100 km/h . If one such bird is flying at 100 km/h relative to the air, but there is a 42.0 km/h wind blowing from west to east.

Part A) At what angle relative to the north-south direction should this bird head so that it will be traveling directly southward relative to the ground?

I got this part! 24.8 (I don't know if this is needed in the next part, so I thought I would mention it)

Part B) How long will it take the bird to cover a ground distance of 600 from north to south?

I tried to do it like the example in the book, using what is basically the pythagorean theorem. The bird travels at 100, wind is 42, leaving a hypotenuse.

So I did 100^2 + 42^2 = C^2 = 108.4km/h
Then, to get how long it takes to travel 600km I did 600/108.4 = 5.5 hours.

It was incorrect. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to A) is right.
The approach in B) seems right as well, only you didn't apply the Pythagorean theorem correctly. Draw the triangle on a piece of paper... what are the straight sides and what is the hypotenuse? Then fill in the numbers and solve for the side you need.
 
  • Like
Likes Presha
Thank you! I completely missed that.

I hope you guys can count the time you spend here as volunteer experience, everyone is so helpful!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top