Calculating Forces in Light Beam Interactions

  • Thread starter Thread starter bob1182006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Forces Light
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two physics problems from Halliday & Resnick regarding force calculations in light beam interactions and chain dynamics. In the first problem, a laser beam exerts a force on an object, but the calculations for displacement are confused by the unknown acceleration of the missile and incorrect assumptions about the forces involved. The second problem involves a chain of links being lifted with a constant acceleration, where participants struggle with applying Newton's second law correctly to find the forces acting on each link. The key takeaway is that when calculating forces, both the upward force from acceleration and the downward gravitational force must be considered together, leading to a greater total force required to lift the chain. Clarifications on the correct application of these principles help resolve the confusion.
bob1182006
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
I have 2 problems I just can't seem to get so I'll post both here instead of making 2 threads.
Both of these are from Halliday & Resnick 5th ed chapter 3 Problems.

Problem #1.
1. Homework Statement

A light beam from a satellite-carried laser strikes an object ejected from an accidentally launched ballistic missile. The beam exerts a force of 2.0 * 10^{-5} N on the target.
If the "dwell time" of the beam on the target is 2.4s by how much is the object displaced if it is
a) a 280-kg warhead
b) a 2.1-kg decoy?

(These displacements can be measured by observing the reflected beam)


Homework Equations


\triangle x=v_0 t +\frac{1}{2}at^2

F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


The missile experiences some uknown horizontal acceleration/velocity so I will just ignore those..
It also experiences a downward acceleration of g.
So does the laser beam?

I need to find the sum of the forces to find the acceleration.
\frac{mg+2.7*10^{-5}}{m} for a I get about 9.8 m/s^2 .
Plugging that into the equation I get a displacement of about 56m but the answer should be some micro-meters..


Problem #9.
1. Homework Statement

A chain consisting of five links, each with mass 100g, is lifted vertically with a constant a =2.5m/s^2.
Find
a) the forces acting between adjacent links
b) the force F exerted on the top link by the agent lifting the chain
c) the net force on each link

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


2.5m/s^2 up
-9.8m/s^2 up

a total of -7.3m/s^2 up

for a.
add up the masses of link+links beneath it and then multiply by 7.3m/s^2 to get a force of:
for the top most link
.5kg*7.3m/s^2 = 3.65 N being exerted on the top link.

Which is completely wrong :/.

for b.
find the total mass and multiply by 7.3m/s^2
F=.5kg*7.3m/s^2=3.65 N
again completely wrong..

for c.
Somehow I got this right...
lowest link force acting upon it is: .1kg*2.5m/s^2 = .25 N
link above it: .2kg*2.5m/s^2=.50 N
...for all others

then subtracting the link force - link below it to get a net force of .25 N on each link.

Any help on either problem is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm mainly trying to get problem #9.

I was working backwards from the answers the book gave.
for a the lowest # and thus the lowest link in the chain I think.

has a total force of 1.23N which requires a force of 12.3 m/s^2 (g+2.5) on a mass of 100g.
Isn't this wrong though? since there's a downward force of .1g N but an upward of .1*2.5 N but somehow the in the book they're adding them...
 
For the first problem, I don't think you should use mg... we don't really know anything about the missile... it may not be accelerating downwards at g (it may have its own thrust or something). we also don't know that the laser is directed straight upwards...
 
For problem 9, part b)

Write this equation out:

\Sigma\vec{F} = ma
 
bob1182006 said:
I'm mainly trying to get problem #9.

I was working backwards from the answers the book gave.
for a the lowest # and thus the lowest link in the chain I think.

has a total force of 1.23N which requires a force of 12.3 m/s^2 (g+2.5) on a mass of 100g.
Isn't this wrong though? since there's a downward force of .1g N but an upward of .1*2.5 N but somehow the in the book they're adding them...
I don't think you are corrrectly applying Newton 2 in your free body diagrams. Isolating the bottom link, there are 2 forces acting on it. You have correctly identified the downward force. The upward force is unknown...call it T. Now use Newton 2nd law...F_net = ma. a is given, don't mess with it.
 
Yea the first problem is weird especially the "These displacements can be measured by observing the reflected beam" o.o since it's barely chapter 3 and I have no knowledge of optics so far.

So sticking to #9.
for part a, there are 2 forces acting on each link, 1 up and 1 down, I add them together right?
so for the lowest link:
.1 kg * 2.5 m/s^2=.25 N
.1 kg * 9.8 m/s^2=.98 N
total being 1.23 N

the second link:
there are 2 links being pulled up so I add the previous link's force + a new link:
1.23 N + (.1kg * 2.5 m/s^2 + .2kg * 9.8 m/s^2) = 1.23 N + 1.23 N=2.46

and so forth for the rest correct?

for part b)
I would do almost the same as I did for part a correct? part a I stop adding @ the 4th link since it has force exerted by the 5th which is topmost and the 3rd beneath it.
 
bob1182006 said:
the second link:
there are 2 links being pulled up so I add the previous link's force + a new link:
1.23 N + (.1kg * 2.5 m/s^2 + .2kg * 9.8 m/s^2) = 1.23 N + 1.23 N=2.46

Not sure what happened above... : .1kg * 2.5 m/s^2 + .2kg * 9.8 m/s^2 is not 1.23... but 2.46 is the correct answer though.
 
sorry did it first as 2ma+2mg=2.46 N
but split it up into (ma+mg)+(ma+mg)=2.46N

just forgot to change that .2 to a .1.

But I'm still curious, why is it that when I add ma and mg they are both positive? a is pointing up but g is pointing down so shouldn't they be subtracting?...
 
bob1182006 said:
sorry did it first as 2ma+2mg=2.46 N
but split it up into (ma+mg)+(ma+mg)=2.46N

just forgot to change that .2 to a .1.

But I'm still curious, why is it that when I add ma and mg they are both positive? a is pointing up but g is pointing down so shouldn't they be subtracting?...

If you're lifting 1 kg object upwards at an acceleration 1.0m/s^2 in a gravityless environment... you only need to exert 1N of force.

If you're lifting 1 kg object upwards at an acceleration 1.0m/s^2 in a 9.8m/s^2 gravity environment... you'll need to exert a greater force... you're exerting a force to compensate for gravity.

Fnet = ma
Fupwards - mg = ma
Fupwards = ma + mg

The greater the gravity... the greater the force required to compensate for gravity, and move the object at the same acceleration.
 
  • #10
learningphysics said:
If you're lifting 1 kg object upwards at an acceleration 1.0m/s^2 in a gravityless environment... you only need to exert 1N of force.

If you're lifting 1 kg object upwards at an acceleration 1.0m/s^2 in a 9.8m/s^2 gravity environment... you'll need to exert a greater force... you're exerting a force to compensate for gravity.

Fnet = ma
Fupwards - mg = ma
Fupwards = ma + mg

The greater the gravity... the greater the force required to compensate for gravity, and move the object at the same acceleration.

ok I think I get it now.
so when I find ma for .1kg m the net force IS .1*2.5=.25N but that is the total of the force I want - mg so that's why I add the mg!

Thanks alot!
 
Back
Top