Calculating frequency and wavelength in solution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the frequency of light in a corn syrup solution after determining its index of refraction and wavelength. The correct approach to find the frequency involves using the wavelength in a vacuum, not the wavelength in the solution. The participant initially calculated the frequency using the wavelength in the solution, leading to an incorrect result. Clarification was provided that the frequency remains constant regardless of the medium, thus requiring the original vacuum wavelength for accurate calculation. This understanding resolved the confusion regarding the frequency calculation.
Carrie
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A laser beam is incident at an angle of 30.0° from the vertical onto a solution of corn syrup in water. The beam is refracted to 22.84° from the vertical.

(a) What is the index of refraction of the corn syrup solution?
I already got the answer of 1.29.
(b) Assume that the light is red, with vacuum wavelength 632.8 nm. Find its wavelength in the solution.
I already got the answer of 490.5 nm.
(c) Find its frequency in the solution?
?

Homework Equations


n1sin(theta)1 = n2sin(theta)2

frequency = c/wavelength

The Attempt at a Solution


I already know the answer, but I'm just confused as to why.

It's asking for the frequency in the solution, so I used f=3*10^8/490*10^-9, which got me 6.1*10^14.

However, this is wrong, and the correct answer did it like this and used f=3*10^8/632.8*10^-9, which gets you the answer of 4.74*10^14. I'm confused because if you're trying to find the frequency in the solution, why are you using the wavelength in the vacuum? Why not use the wavelength in the solution?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Carrie said:
why are you using the wavelength in the vacuum? Why not use the wavelength in the solution?
If ##v## and ##\lambda## is the light velocity and wavelength in a medium then ##v=c/n## and ##\lambda = \lambda_0/n##. Then
$$
v = \lambda f \\
\frac{c}{n} = \frac{\lambda_0}{n} f
$$
hence
$$
f = \frac{c}{\lambda_0}
$$.
 
Ohhh, I see where I went wrong now. Thank you! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top