Calculating Friction Coefficient with 40 N Force and 5 kg Box

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the coefficient of friction for a 5 kg box being pushed with a force of 40 N and accelerating at 0.70 m/s², it's essential to determine the net force acting on the box. The net force can be calculated using Newton's second law, which states that force equals mass times acceleration. If the applied force differs from the net force, it indicates the presence of friction, which is the force opposing the motion. The discussion emphasizes that understanding the net force is crucial for finding the coefficient of friction, rather than focusing on kinetic energy. Properly addressing these calculations will lead to the correct determination of the friction coefficient.
kirstynl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
okay, i tried searching knietic energy and it won't come up,
soooo here's a questions:


a force of 40 N continues to push a 5 kg box and acclerates it a .70 m/s/s what is the coefficient of friction/

i got the static because it wasn't movingm, but i have no idiea how to get that please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, tell us what was the net force acting on the body.
 
This problem has nothing to do with kinetic energy! As shooting star said (I seem to spending the day right behind him!), it is entirely a matter of force. What is the net force on the body? Also I have no idea what you mean by "I got the static because it wasn't moving". What wasn't moving? What "static"?
 
kirstynl said:
i got the static because it wasn't movingm, but i have no idiea how to get that please help

Do you by chance mean you "get" the case for static friction? Anyway, reply to our questions if you want to understand the problem.
 
if the acceleration is .7 m/s^2, and the box has a mass of five kilograms, Newton will only take a second to tell you the net force on the box.

Of course, if there's a difference between the applied force and the net force, there must be another force acting on the box. This is where you'll find your kinetic friction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top