Calculating Heat Absorbed & Temperature Change of Rocks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating heat absorbed and temperature change of rocks used in solar heating. For part (a), the user successfully calculated the heat absorbed by 50 kg of rocks, yielding 490,000 J when the temperature increases by 12°C. In part (b), the user struggles to rearrange the formula to find the temperature change when 450 kJ of heat is emitted. Assistance is provided to clarify the rearrangement process, emphasizing the correct formula manipulation. The user is also advised that creating new threads for different questions is acceptable.
FTCC.student
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Large beds of rock are used in some solar-heated homes to store heat. Assume that the specific heat of the rocks is 0.82 J/g-K. (a) Calculate the quantity of heat absorbed by 50.0 kg of rocks if their temperature increases by 12.0°C. (b) What temperature change would these rocks undergo if they emitted 450 kJ of heat?

Homework Equations



Cs=\frac{q}{m * ΔT}

The Attempt at a Solution



For part a, I have rearranged the formula to give me q=Cs X m X ΔT, and got an answer of 4.9*105 J. Part B, however, all I could think to do was try and rearrange the equation again by solving for ΔT. Either I cannot figure out how to rearrange it (this is probably the case, I was never very good at that), or I am on the wrong track completely. Either way, I'm probably also over-thinking it.

Also, a question about forum rules, I am studying for a test that is tomorrow afternoon and will probably have several other questions tonight on a variety of subjects (such as ΔH, electron config, net ionic equations, concentrations of solutions/molarity etc). Am I allowed to create a new thread for each question or should I stick to this thread?

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi FTCC.student! :smile:
FTCC.student said:
(b) What temperature change would these rocks undergo if they emitted 450 kJ of heat?

Part B, however, all I could think to do was try and rearrange the equation again by solving for ΔT.

Should work.

Show us how far you got.
… Am I allowed to create a new thread for each question …

yes :smile:

quick! :wink:
 
Well okay, this is what I got when I tried to solve for delta-T (I tried twice and did something wrong, I can't remember how to isolate it because it is in the denominator...) the -x- represents that variable being cancelled.


ΔT = \frac{C<sub>s</sub>*m}{q}

Which gave me: ΔT=(0.82 J/g-K)(50.0g)/450kJ

That answer was far from correct. I also tried multiplying all my given variables, also far from correct :(

So what I'm really confused on here probably isn't the actual chemistry portion, just how to rearrange the dang formula
 
FTCC.student said:
ΔT = \frac{C_s*m}{q}
(Your LaTex was messed up because you used "" inside . That doesn&#039;t work. You have to use _ for subscript, ^ for superscript, etc.)<br /> Let&#039;s try that one step at a time:<br /> <div style="margin-left: 20px">C<sub>s</sub>=\frac{q}{m * ΔT}&#8203;</div>Multiply both sides by ΔT<br /> <div style="margin-left: 20px">ΔT*C<sub>s</sub>=\frac{q}{m}&#8203;</div>What next?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Thread 'How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)'
This is the final problem in this problem set from MIT OCW. Here is what I did to try to solve it The table cited in the problem is below We can easily spot the two redox couples that are in the electrochemical cell we are given. The hydrogen-based electrode has standard potential zero, and the silver-based electrode has standard potential 0.22. Thus, the hydrogen electrode, with the lower potential, is the reducing agent (ie, it is where oxidation happens) and is the anode. Electrons...
Back
Top